Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

> On 24 May 2018, at 11:48, Keifer Bly wrote: > > What does it mean? Does it mean my relay will be unreachable? Thank you. This bug happens because Tor doesn't check for relay information correctly. It's harmless on relays, and you should ignore it. T

Re: [tor-relays] Verizon AS701 blocking Tor consensus server tor26 (86.59.21.38)

Hi tor-relays mailing list, Good news! Verizon unblocked tor26 (86.59.21.38). I posted something similar on NANOG (with modifications for network people) here: https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2018-May/095386.html Someone nice at Verizon must have read NANOG (VZ NOC people probably

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

What does it mean? Does it mean my relay will be unreachable? Thank you. Sent from my iPhone > On May 24, 2018, at 11:40 AM, teor wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 24 May 2018, at 11:27, Keifer Bly wrote: >> >> May 24 11:24:14.000 [warn] Bug: Non-fatal

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

Hi, > On 24 May 2018, at 11:27, Keifer Bly wrote: > > May 24 11:24:14.000 [warn] Bug: Non-fatal assertion info || client failed in > onion_extend_cpath at src/or/circuitbuild.c:2772. Stack trace: (on Tor > 0.3.3.6 7dd0813e783ae16e) Thanks for reporting this bug! It's a

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

EDIT: It also just popped up with "May 24 11:25:18.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test…done.” Thank you. > On May 24, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Colin Childs wrote: > > Hi Keifer, > > When doing Tor version upgrades (and not just config changes), there is no > way to

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

Hi, so I just restarted tor process, and this is the output May 24 11:23:59.876 [notice] Tor 0.3.3.6 (git-7dd0813e783ae16e) running on Darwin with Libevent 2.1.8-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.2o, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma N/A, and Libzstd N/A. May 24 11:23:59.877 [notice] Tor can't help you if you use it

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

Hi Keifer, When doing Tor version upgrades (and not just config changes), there is no way to restart the process without losing uptime; as uptime records the amount of time that the Tor process has been running without interruption. When doing version upgrades, stopping your previous version

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

“killall tor” to stop the process then “tor” to start it again usually works, but I wonder if there is a way to do this without loosing uptime as this does? Thank you. Sent from my iPhone > On May 24, 2018, at 4:30 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > >> On 24.05.18 08:17,

Re: [tor-relays] Unable to confirm my ORPort is reachable

Perhaps you can have the following problem if you use Linux: On some Linux system the iptable firewall block incoming connections by default. If I remember correctly, CentOS is a candidate for this behavior. After a general reset and configuring open ports I had success with my relay. An easy

Re: [tor-relays] Why adding more Nodes won't help?

> On 24 May 2018, at 05:00, dave` dave wrote: > > i saw that is a way to change the numbers of nodes in this site > http://thesprawl.org/research/tor-control-protocol/#creating-really-fast-one-hop-circuits > any one knows how it works, there is not enough information how

Re: [tor-relays] Unable to confirm my ORPort is reachable

On 5/24/18 10:53, Yash Kumar wrote: > Hi all, >  I have set up a tor relay on my Ubuntu machine by following the > instructions given in the link > . To > > [...] > > Can anyone please help me with this issue? > I am not able to figure

Re: [tor-relays] Unable to confirm my ORPort is reachable

what about port forwarding on the router / modem adsl ? Il giorno gio 24 mag 2018 alle ore 16:54 Yash Kumar ha scritto: > Hi all, > I have set up a tor relay on my Ubuntu machine by following the instructions given in the link. To confirm whether the setup was done

[tor-relays] Unable to confirm my ORPort is reachable

Hi all, I have set up a tor relay on my Ubuntu machine by following the instructions given in the link . To confirm whether the setup was done properly, I checked the status using the command: $ sudo service tor status and was getting

Re: [tor-relays] Why adding more Nodes won't help?

i saw that is a way to change the numbers of nodes in this site http://thesprawl.org/research/tor-control-protocol/#creating-really-fast-one-hop-circuits any one knows how it works, there is not enough information how to use it. On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Peter Ludikovsky

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

On 24.05.18 08:17, Valter Jansons wrote: > I have not worked on macOS services, but as I understand it, executing > `sudo launchctl stop servicename && sudo launchctl stop servicename` > should do the job for restarting the service [...] That might not work as intended, depending on macOS

Re: [tor-relays] Why adding more Nodes won't help?

For that I'd suggest you look into running a separated test network with all nodes having TestingTorNetwork 1 in their torrc. Then you can change the hop number in the source & experiment away, without impacting the real network. Regards, /peter On 2018-05-24 10:30, dave` dave wrote: I

Re: [tor-relays] Why adding more Nodes won't help?

I don't have something specific to hide, i just wonder how can i set more or less node for testing- im running all the nodes(Bridge,Guard, middle and exit) and i wanna know if I'm define for example one node the traffic will be encrypt or not?(if i can define a one node only) or adding more nodes.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Software Update Question

> Here is something I have noticed, my computer says it’s running > tor 0.3.3.6 (upgraded today), but my status at > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/DB1AF6477BB276B6EA5E72132684096EEE779D30 > says it’s running a different version (0.3.2.10). Any idea on why this might > be