>> exit node in my home
> I also allow 993/995 (IMAP/POP3 over SSL). Sadly, I don't allow 465,
> SMTP over SSL, though I've pondered enabling it.
If you're trying to help standalone MUA users send email...
465 - this is smtp over TLS, you don't / rarely want this
legacy mashup thing
567 - this
I'd suggest looking at the reduced exit policy. I don't think I've gotten any
complaints from Comcast after switching to a customized version of it.
Generally speaking, 80/443 is "safe" and very useful. Port 22 (SSH) is very
useful, but often generates complaints and I currently don't allow it
Good morning fellow exit node operators,
I have set up an exit node in my home on a separate IP address away from all
other traffic. I'm well aware of the risks from dated articles posted many
years ago, so if you're going to send warnings and scary stories, please do so
off list.
I won't be
Hi,
i am with my exit node also on an Contabo VServer. I got now also some
Abuse Notices, mostly from one ISP/Serverhoster who did them with a bot
and only one from a Fail2Ban server. Contabo is allways angry with me,
becouse i just block the IPS in the Abusemail and tell them that i did
> On 26. Sep 2018, at 11:03, Moritz Bartl wrote:
>
> On 9/25/18 12:02 AM, tor-markus wrote:
>> the second abuse ticket reached Contabo yesterday about my service.
>> They now threaten to take down the server when the next ticket arrives so I
>> had to shutdown the Exit Relay (I will
On 9/25/18 12:02 AM, tor-markus wrote:
> the second abuse ticket reached Contabo yesterday about my service.
> They now threaten to take down the server when the next ticket arrives so I
> had to shutdown the Exit Relay (I will reconfigure it as normal relay
> tomorrow).
> I requested to have a
