Sorry but if a Tor friendly commercial, non profit, volunteer, or
whatever other type of vendor / provider wants to come here
and announce [or solicit mutual development of more amenable
custom] hosting solutions and services for tor relays... that's
valuable and fine.
In no small part because...
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 22:47, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> * teor:
>
>> If a client doesn't have a circuit to an exit that supports the port
>> it wants, it randomly chooses an exit that allows that port.
>
> Sure, but is the distinction of what is considered "an exit" reflected
> in the exit
* teor:
> If a client doesn't have a circuit to an exit that supports the port
> it wants, it randomly chooses an exit that allows that port.
Sure, but is the distinction of what is considered "an exit" reflected
in the exit flag? And is it truly random, or does the consensus weight
factor into
tor ships with an integrated feature to do collect (and publish)
exit port statistics.
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en#ExitPortStatistics
It is not stated in the manual entry but it does not include all ports,
just the top 10 (including 'other').
Some exits have this enabled
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 16:41, DaKnOb wrote:
>
> You can exit to one of (80,443) to at least a /8 to receive it.. So if you
> add an allow 443 on a not so populated /8, it will get the exit flag.. :-)
Careful:
* this isn't a great experience for users who use your exit, and
* getting the Exit
You can exit to one of (80,443) to at least a /8 to receive it.. So if you add
an allow 443 on a not so populated /8, it will get the exit flag.. :-)
> On 30 Oct 2018, at 17:30, Spiros Andreou wrote:
>
> Just a note that I believe you will lose the exit flag for not having at
> least ports 80
