On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 02:57:33 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Nicknames are required to be non-empty, did that stop any abuse?
Correction: Nicknames default to "Unnamed" when unset. However did any of the
recent abuse or suspected-malicious relays actually use "Unnamed"? From your
E-Mails trying to r
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 21:25:00 +
nusenu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> due to some recent and ongoing events related
> to a malicious entity running tor relays
> I'll start to pursue an idea that I had
> for some time: require non-empty ContactInfo
> (non-empty does not mean valid email address)
>
> This
Hi,
due to some recent and ongoing events related
to a malicious entity running tor relays
I'll start to pursue an idea that I had
for some time: require non-empty ContactInfo
(non-empty does not mean valid email address)
This is primarily a non-technical policy discussion
which will take place
