[tor-relays] german plans on banning TOR

News from german country NRW - There is a gouvernment bill about criminalizing TOR! https://www.bundesrat.de/SharedDocs/drucksachen/2019/0001-0100/33-19.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1   ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https:

Re: [tor-relays] german plans on banning TOR

U no it isn’t. > On 6. Mar 2019, at 15:47, Volker Mink wrote: > > News from german country NRW - > There is a gouvernment bill about criminalizing TOR! > > https://www.bundesrat.de/SharedDocs/drucksachen/2019/0001-0100/33-19.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1 > > > > ___

Re: [tor-relays] german plans on banning TOR

$Tor mentioned too often, around 13 times in 17-page pdf, named specifically, and explicitly in order not to be taken seriously. What else but criminalizing? Call it pro law-and-order populism. Once more: Christian "Democrats" led government, this case of North Rhine-Westphalia. -- Herbert K

[tor-relays] tor bridge traffic

Hi Folks.   Short question on TOR Bridges: What average traffic runs through a TOR Bridge? Can someone give a rough number?     br, volker ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [tor-relays] tor bridge traffic

Depends … shitty answer I know, but there is no good answer to this. In most cases you are more than fine with a 1 TB VPS. So buy the cheapest you can get, no need for expensive 100 mbit flatrates … > On 6. Mar 2019, at 16:52, Volker Mink wrote: > > Hi Folks. > > Short question on TOR Bridg

Re: [tor-relays] tor bridge traffic

Thats enough for me, thanks :) If - can i limit the daily quota in the torrc for a bridge?     Gesendet: Mittwoch, 06. März 2019 um 17:11 Uhr Von: "niftybunny" An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] tor bridge traffic Depends … shitty answer I know, but there is no good

Re: [tor-relays] tor bridge traffic

Yes, but I would not advice it. Just give it a go and take a look after a week how much traffic you pushed. Enjoy your new shiny bridge :) > On 6. Mar 2019, at 17:14, Volker Mink wrote: > > Thats enough for me, thanks :) > If - can i limit the daily quota in the torrc for a bridge? > > >

Re: [tor-relays] tor bridge traffic

Is it really that easy? Is there any possibility to monitor this bridge with arm? Or doesnt arm see there anything?   taken from https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges.html.en   , added some lines [torrc] SocksPort 0 RunAsDaemon 1 ORPort auto DataDirectory /var/lib/tor ControlPort 9051 Hashed

Re: [tor-relays] tor bridge traffic

ARM does work on every relay, it doesnt discriminate. So it works just fine. Your data center should give you some stats. If not: ifconfig is your new friend. > On 6. Mar 2019, at 18:59, Volker Mink wrote: > > Is it really that easy? > Is there any possibility to monitor this bridge with arm?

Re: [tor-relays] german plans on banning TOR

Some contradictions in the recommendations of the committee: Take a look on page 6 and 7 (in german, translation of the sentences below). "Zum anderen ist die Zugänglichmachung jedes internetbasierten Angebots, das auf die Begehung jeglicher Straftaten gerichtet ist, gleichermaßen strafwürdig."

Re: [tor-relays] german plans on banning TOR

> "Zum anderen ist die Zugänglichmachung jedes > internetbasierten Angebots, das auf die Begehung jeglicher > Straftaten gerichtet ist, gleichermaßen strafwürdig." Thats every ISP on the world. Every ISP on the world lets you connect to the internet. What they want to do is outlaw the running of

Re: [tor-relays] german plans on banning TOR

Let's be pragmatic: There's "anti-darkweb" propaganda been quite a while going on, mainly by Federal Criminal Police Office, backed up by Christian (so-called) Democrats, and the Nazi party, sure, pointing out like lots of children's lives could be saved, or saved from being abused, resp., when