> On 9 Apr 2019, at 12:10, Ben Riley wrote:
>
> So I've edited my torrc file again. My upload and download speeds are
> different, 11MB/sec down and only about 4MB/sec up.
> I've set my limits as 3.9MB/s and burst to 4.4MB/s. Just updated the OS, so
> the machine had to reset.
> Have to admit
So I've edited my torrc file again. My upload and download speeds are
different, 11MB/sec down and only about 4MB/sec up.
I've set my limits as 3.9MB/s and burst to 4.4MB/s. Just updated the OS, so
the machine had to reset.
Have to admit it feels like such as waste. It's currently using about
4-6KB
Hello!
I'dont know why, but the stable-flag is back again.
Today I've got (until now) many times the nyx notice that my relay is
unresponsive and the notice that it was resumed (with 260 duplicates hidden.
Yours
SMichel
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Am Do
Thank you! I'll wait...
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Am Samstag, 6. April 2019 09:28 schrieb nusenu :
> No, IPv6 is not required for any type of tor relay.
>
>
>
> https://twitter.com/nusenu_
> https:/
On 2019-04-07 23:57:58, "teor" wrote:
It looks like your relay could be CPU-core-limited, or limited by some other
local resource, or limited by its location.
Currently the CPU is only using 40% of 1 core (out of 4). All of it from
Tor when BW is close to 250Mbps
When routing from the LAN (iper
On 4/5/19 10:58 AM, ylms wrote:
> "[WARN] Error binding network socket: Address already in use [991
> duplicates hidden]"
>
> I did use a search engine, but am not sure what too look for further.
> Also let me know if I should not worry at all.
>
> 991 warnings are probably since tor is running
On 4/5/19 6:16 PM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> Hint for ylms: Socks 0 + reject in the torrc config.
>
> SocksPort 0
> SocksPolicy reject *
I think the latter is not needed because I did set "SocksPort 0" now,
then reloaded the config and got this:
09:06:52 [NOTICE] Closing no-longer-configu
On 4/5/19 5:31 PM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> Am 05.04.2019 10:58, schrieb ylms:
>
>> can someone point me at some information about this warning?
>>
>> "[WARN] Error binding network socket: Address already in use [991
>> duplicates hidden]"
>
> Log message is clear:
> You have assigned a
