2MB * 60 * 60 * 24 *31 = 5356800 megz
$5 will give you 1 TB with DigitalOcean ...
This will not work out.
I would recommend pushing Italy a little. There are datacenter with no traffic
limits.
> On 20. Jul 2019, at 01:13, friendlyexitnode
> wrote:
>
> This question ties into something
The making of a bridge authority desire is from the observation that here in
South America we haven't any authority and I think this can help tor to improve
the network metrics on South America side. Also maybe in another countries too.
Of course, all the current authorities are good but maybe
Hi,
i wanted to run my bridge on 443 too but i had the same problem on Raspbian
Buster with Tor 0.4.0.5
I asked Google but choosing a port above 1024 was the only thing that made
it working for me.
Am Fr., 19. Juli 2019 um 11:52 Uhr schrieb :
> > On July 19, 2019 at 6:36 AM Ben Riley wrote:
>
This question ties into something I've wondered for a while: Is there a minimum
preferred bandwidth rate for relays? I had done some rough calculations a while
ago that a $5 VPS from something like Digitalocean could provide approximately
2MiB/s while not exceeding the allotted bandwidth.At
> On July 19, 2019 at 1:44 PM Ben Riley wrote:
>
>
> To follow up my previous email, I found the "Firewall" app and I've
> manually opened 9051 & 8531 in that, and when I tested those via the online
> port checking tools, they are now open.
>
> Restarted TOR (sudo systemctl restart tor) and
Thanks :) It appears to still be running happily this morning. Low
activity, but that's ok.
Interestingly, the fingerprint is now showing the previous relay one. As in
I originally named my relay:
MelbTORbox - 9F19251CEE17B1E05084898D164F0544CCB095DD then when I switched
to a bridge,
