Hi niftybunny, Mitar,
> On 7 Aug 2019, at 17:37, niftybunny
> wrote:
>
> Thats complete and utter bullshit.
After thinking about it for a while, I have allowed this email through
moderation.
I considered rejecting it, because this thread is getting repetitive.
And it seems like you're
Thats complete and utter bullshit.
First off, nice to see you are fighting for the good in the world, while having
a company in Delaware. Paying 0% taxes. Fuck the working poor, fuck all
taxpayers and fuck the government that need these taxes … nice touch .
On 2019-08-06 23:31:39, "Rob Jansen" wrote:
Today, I started running the speedtest on all relays in the network. So far, I
have finished about 100 relays (and counting). I expect that the advertised
bandwidths reported by metrics will increase over the next few days. For this
to happen, the
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 8:17 PM, teor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 6 Aug 2019, at 20:12, Mitar wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have deployed it:
>>
>> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/567E9785458C605E59202755C74898E3C96FB1CC
>>
>> On gigabit fiber, using this NUC:
>>
>>
Hi!
Has anyone tested how does configuring SQM on Tor nodes influence the
quality of circuits over the node? Throughput, latency? So given that
circuits have 3 hops in serial I would assume that any
buffering/latency issues on nodes combine in a bad way. So using some
smart queue management (SQM)
Hi!
One interesting option could be that the existing tor servers
non-profit applies as a host organization. And then other tor-based
projects could be fiscally sponsored by it. That means other tor-based
projects would not have to have/be a non-profit (and could decide to
not take any pay cut).
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:30 AM niftybunny
wrote:
> Okay, I´ll bite. How do they solve this?
You can see the list of hosts they have here:
https://opencollective.com/hosts
> They have ready made non profits in Germany (eingetragener gemeinnütziger
> Verein) that I can use and rename and
