Re: [tor-relays] bwauths don't like one of my relays?

2020-01-20 Thread teor
Hi, Thanks for reporting this issue, and sorry it's taken us a while to get back to you. Many of us have been on leave over the holidays, and we're still catching up. > On 4 Jan 2020, at 10:18, trusting.mcnu...@protonmail.com wrote: > > An update on my relay 'kima'

Re: [tor-relays] TCP CCA for Tor Relays (and especially Bridges)

2020-01-20 Thread Alex Xu
Quoting Iain Learmonth (2020-01-20 16:00:01) > Last time I looked you could not switch TCP congestion control algorithm > in Linux per-namespace (maybe you can now and you don't need to have > multiple VMs). It's been allowed for about two years now [0], but you don't need it anyways. Trying out

Re: [tor-relays] TCP CCA for Tor Relays (and especially Bridges)

2020-01-20 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 11/01/2020 05:07, Matt Corallo wrote: > Sadly, the large scale deployments of BBR are mostly not high-latency links > (as CDNs generally have a nearby datacenter for you to communicate with), and > the high retransmission rates may result in more “lag” for browsing when > absolute

Re: [tor-relays] ContactInfo-Information-Sharing-Specification updates and final comments until 2020-02-02

2020-01-20 Thread teor
Hi, > On 20 Jan 2020, at 17:43, Georg Koppen wrote: > > nusenu: >> Georg Koppen: >>> Yes, that's what I figured. So, it seems to me not all your proposed >>> keys are equally important (e.g. your require the email one). Which of >>> those (or maybe even which cluster of those) are/is important