Hi,
great to see that the Tor network can lose ~20% capacity without having
impact on the performance of the complete network. So can we get rid of
the non dual stack relays now too?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https:
Hi Karsten
I'm the operator of bauruine51 (185.204.1.239). Finland is the correct
location and not Russia.
Other relays with the same hoster which are also wrong:
- SingularET
- AutoNoMe
- whatevr8
- BlackHall
The nodes that are FI in MaxMind and DE in your alternative are most
On 7/7/20 7:13 PM, NOC wrote:
>
> great to see that the Tor network can lose ~20% capacity
What let you think that this is correct ?
--
Toralf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproje
While I fully support the direction here I do wonder if there’s not also other
information that could be used. Eg in bitcoin-land we have persistent issues
with anti-privacy services operating large numbers of relays all one three
ASNs. In the future, we’ll likely be shipping a compressed netbl
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 10:20, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
> On 2020-02-12 16:05, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> > Hi relay operators,
> >
> > as you might have heard, MaxMind has changed access and use of their
> > GeoLite2 databases:
> >
> > https://blog.maxmind.com/2019/12/18/significant-changes-to-access
On 2020-02-12 16:05, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi relay operators,
>
> as you might have heard, MaxMind has changed access and use of their
> GeoLite2 databases:
>
> https://blog.maxmind.com/2019/12/18/significant-changes-to-accessing-and-using-geolite2-databases/
>
> This affects Onionoo and tor
