On 10/4/21 1:36 PM, David Goulet wrote:
> On 02 Oct (01:29:56), torix via tor-relays wrote:
>> My relays (Aramis) marked overloaded don't make any sense either. Two of
>> the ones marked with orange are the two with the lowest traffic I have (2-5
>> MiB/s and 4-9 MiB/s - not pushing any limits
Thanks! You don't have an email-friendly version of that proposal by
chance, which one could reply to inline?
there is just the .md file.
You can also comment inline on the md file on gitlab.
Due to David's comment on tor-dev there is a merge request on gitlab:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/t
Hello!
Relays running unsupported Tor versions is a problem we have never
really dealt with in a systematic way in the way. Some of you might
recall that we (with the help of volunteers) tried back in 2019/2020 to
get operators, running an unsupported Tor version, to upgrade[1] but
then we dropped
Georg,
Thank you for the reference that confirms the Advertised Bandwidth is from the
Tor client.
I still don't understand why my Tor nodes aren't able to initiate a 10 second
burst higher than 4MB/s. An Internet Speed Test is able to sustain a burst near
my advertised 250Mb/s up and down.
Am I
nusenu:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote down a spec for a simple web of trust
> for relay operator IDs:
>
> https://gitlab.torproject.org/nusenu/torspec/-/blob/simple-wot-for-relay-operator-ids/proposals/ideas/xxx-simple-relay-operator-wot.md#a-simple-web-of-trust-for-tor-relay-operator-ids
Thanks! You don't
Gary C. New via tor-relays:
>
> David Goulet:
>
>
>
>
> Will you confirm whether the Advertised Bandwidth metric is also client
> initiated (I'm assuming to the Directory Authority)?
>
>
>
>
> I have a 250Mb pipe and have seen a maximum Advertised Bandwidth rate of
> 4MB/s with my Tor re
