Re: [tor-relays] Max number of bridge under the same IP

gus : > > > From the Tor Relay Guide: > > > > "Note: You can only run two Tor relays per public IPv4 address. If you > > want to run more than two relays you will need more IPv4 addresses." > > https://community.torproject.org/relay/relays-requirements/ > > > Why was it decided to allow only two

Re: [tor-relays] General overload -> DNS timeouts

Hi Ibex There's some discussion about this issue on #tor-relays. First of all, I actually don't think there's any problem with your Exit node. IMO 1.5% is expected and the current threshold is just too low (or the timeout too low). We're hosting some fairly high capacity exit nodes (around

Re: [tor-relays] Max number of bridge under the same IP

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 07:02:13PM +0100, ML Tor wrote: > In data 8/11/2021, *gus* ha scritto: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:24:13PM +0100, ML Tor wrote: > > Hi, > hi made a new Proxmox server for my home network. I still run a bare metal > Tor bridge, but now i would run more bridge

Re: [tor-relays] Max number of bridge under the same IP

Hi, On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:24:13PM +0100, ML Tor wrote: > Hi, > hi made a new Proxmox server for my home network. I still run a bare metal > Tor bridge, but now i would run more bridge in my home network. > > I have a public dynamic IP: what is the max number of bridge i can run > (obviously

[tor-relays] Max number of bridge under the same IP

Hi, hi made a new Proxmox server for my home network. I still run a bare metal Tor bridge, but now i would run more bridge in my home network. I have a public dynamic IP: what is the max number of bridge i can run (obviously on different ORPort) under the same IP address Thanks in advance, --

Re: [tor-relays] [Looking for feedback] An easier way to declare families

Hi Nick, On 06.11.2021 15:36, Nick Mathewson wrote: an attacker could guess it and become a family member. Why would that be a problem? All the best Leibi ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org