On 12/9/22 07:02, David Fifield wrote:
But now there is rdsys and bridgestrap, which may have the ability to
test the obfs4 port rather than the ORPort. I cannot say whether that
removes the requirement to expose the ORPort.
Would be a step toward to make scanning for bridges harder IMO, if the
David,
In my implementation of the loadbalanced OBFS4 configuration, it appears that
BridgeDB still tests the ORPort for availability and without it marks the OBFS4
bridge as being down.
I gather that default bridges don't require a DistributionMethod as your
loadbalanced Snowflake configuration
On 2022/12/01 20:35, Christopher Sheats wrote:
> Does anyone have experience troubleshooting and/or fixing this problem?
Like I wrote in [1], I think it would be interesting to hear if the
patch from pseudonymisaTor in ticket #26646[2] would be of any help in
the given situation. The patch allows
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 09:47:07AM +, Alexander Færøy wrote:
> On 2022/12/01 20:35, Christopher Sheats wrote:
> > Does anyone have experience troubleshooting and/or fixing this problem?
>
> Like I wrote in [1], I think it would be interesting to hear if the
> patch from pseudonymisaTor in tick
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 12/9/22 07:02, David Fifield wrote:
> > But now there is rdsys and bridgestrap, which may have the ability to
> > test the obfs4 port rather than the ORPort. I cannot say whether that
> > removes the requirement to expose the ORPo
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 08:43:26AM +, Gary C. New wrote:
> In my implementation of the loadbalanced OBFS4 configuration, it appears that
> BridgeDB still tests the ORPort for availability and without it marks the
> OBFS4 bridge as being down.
I see. Then yes, I suppose it is still necessary
