Re: [tor-relays] Relay data limit

2023-12-22 Thread George Hartley via tor-relays
Hi Dan, that would have been my first choice as well. Now with the additional traffic available to you, you can still rate-limit the relay to a relatively usable speed and not get throttled at all. Let me know, I'd like to know some of your traffic statistics, just to see how your relay perfor

Re: [tor-relays] Relay data limit

2023-12-22 Thread John Crow via tor-relays
Hello Dan,> I'll probably remove all limits for January and just see how much traffic gets transferred.I would highly advise against this since you are using VPS with a capped bandwidth plan. Tor will use all of the bandwidth you give it. Therefore if you remove all limits that may lead to compl

Re: [tor-relays] Relay data limit

2023-12-22 Thread Chris Enkidu-6
Hi Dan, There's of course another option. Change your provider unless it's important to you to use them in particular. The market is full of good deals with very good bandwidth allowances. I really don't understand how some providers can get away with using bandwidth as money grab. I use my own b

Re: [tor-relays] Relay data limit

2023-12-22 Thread Dan
Hi George, Thanks for all the input. > Or, just ask the provider for more bandwidth per month, generally now in 2023 > it's pretty damn cheap. I had not considered this, but when contacted my VPS provider offered another 5TB for an additional $3/month. Considering the box only costs $4/month,

Re: [tor-relays] Tor: tor_bug_occurred_(): Bug: conflux_pick_first_leg: Non-fatal assertion !(smartlist_len(cfx->legs) <= 0) failed. (on Tor 0.4.8.10)

2023-12-22 Thread George Hartley via tor-relays
Hello, this just happened again 5 days after the update to 0.4.8.10: > Dec 21 13:54:54 matrix tor[558]: Dec 21 13:54:54.000 [warn] > tor_bug_occurred_(): Bug: src/core/or/conflux.c:567: conflux_pick_first_leg: > Non-fatal assertion !(smartlist_len(cfx->legs) <= 0) failed. (on Tor 0.4.8.10 > )