On 10/16/2014 11:31 AM, Derric Atzrott wrote:
Out of curiosity, has anyone reached out to the guys running the Kickstarter?
Yes. I and others have been talking to August since last week, before
the article was published and kickstarter was launched.
--
Andrew
pgp 0x6B4D6475
On 10/15/2014 08:00 AM, Thomas White wrote:
I am personally hoping somebody high up in the Tor Project management
will openly condemn this atrocity and hopefully Kickstarter and the
funders will withdraw their funds before a whole load of people buy
into this security as a tool idea.
I'm more
On 07/10/2014 07:23 PM, Jesse Victors wrote:
My ISP now tells me that they could reduce
the reports even further by routing the exits through a
next-generation firewall which apparently can detect an obvious
clearnet attack and drop that connection a few milliseconds after the
attack occurs.
It seems Yahoo and AOL email servers have decided to refuse all messages
from this tor-relays list. Other lists aren't affected, yet.
We're seeing this message from Yahoo and AOL servers:
Status: 5.2.1
Remote-MTA: dns; mailin-04.mx.aol.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 521 5.2.1 : (DMARC) This message
On 06/04/2014 06:35 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2014-06-05 00:06, Roger Dingledine wrote:
What is the best way to run a relay on OS X currently?
But if you just want tor though, try Homebrew:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/tor.rb
We could really use
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:36:39 -0400
Rick reru...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, I don't think so. Perhaps it's the timing. In this post-Snowden
period most everything is a little bit creepy. There's plenty of FUD
to go around. A position paper from Torproject on this and other
recent issues would be
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:29:26 -0400
t...@t-3.net wrote:
In the context of September 2013, this whole thing is scary. It was
perhaps not scary in September of 2012, when we didn't know anything.
Just a point that many in the tech community knew what was happening, at
some level, for the past
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:58:12 -0700
Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:32:55AM -0500, Pascal wrote:
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de indicates that only 21.4% of Tor nodes
are exit nodes. Are we wasting this precious resource by running
non-exit traffic through
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:46:19 +0200
Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote:
There's no way a bridge operator knows which bucket you're in.
Actually, there is (finally) a way to find out:
http://globe.rndm.de
This tells me there isn't an official way to find out. It's a work a
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:11:38 -0700
Shawn A. Miller salexandermil...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been running a Tor bridge on the Amazon EC2 cloud computing
platform (per instructions at https://cloud.torproject.org/) since
July 27, and while the bridge is up and running according to the logs,
there
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:05:47 +1000
Shane Nagle sh...@shanenagle.com wrote:
I have sent several emails to the Tor mailing lists but so far have
heard no reply or seen any posting of my inquiry.
Any support would be appreciated.
The best place for support is to email h...@rt.torproject.org.
As
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:08:05 +0200
Andreas Fink af...@datacell.com wrote:
Traffic from Iceland is still relatively expensive. However we could
host some machines in other places where we interconnect on internet
exchanges.
Is this true for IPv6 too? I've found asking for IPv6-only servers is
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:47:21 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
So if I understand correctly, I should use
$ unset LDFLAGS
$ CFLAGS=-O -g -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -arch ppc
$ ./configure --with-libevent-dir=/opt/local
--with-openssl-dir=/opt/local --disable-dependency-tracking
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:30:58 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
No OSX10.4 build machine now as well as no OSX10.3 . All that old
hardware going to waste.
The 10.3 machine had the system board partially melt during a qt
compile (which takes 15 hours on a ppc). Turns out the cpu
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:46:21 -0500
Justin Aplin jap...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, I think the devtools for 10.5 can backport to
10.4, and I know that the 10.4 devtools can build for 10.2 and 10.3.
Well, in theory, at least; I've never tried it myself.
We could never get the
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:21:44 -0500
Steve Snyder swsny...@snydernet.net wrote:
Can someone tell how being a bridge compares to being a regular exit
node in terms of traffic?
The difference is vast. Exit nodes will use all configured bandwidth.
Bridges, depending how many users you attract, are
On Thursday, October 20, 2011 21:30:59 Rick Huebner wrote:
way of using Tor as a client. How can I run the TBB on my system
without interfering with my relay?
TBB supports randomized socks port and control port configurations. I use it on
a relay just fine.
These options are disabled on
17 matches
Mail list logo