Those are not our machines and moreover, we have not received any
measurement (i.e., traceroute data) from those IPs. One more thing our
traceroutes use UDP packets, not TCP packets.
Thanks
Anupam
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:07 PM, wrote:
> forgot log entries
>
>
Hi Torland,
Yes our server tracks the ip used by ssh. We don't want
to reset the script at this point as data are being uploaded. Hope this
doesn't create too much of a problem for you.
Thanks
Anupam
On Sunday, February 23, 2014, tor-admin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me th
Hi Jon,
Can you send me the IPs (maybe you can send us a private email at
tor-tracerou...@illinois.edu) of the machines so that I can check what is
going on.
Thanks
Anupam
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Jon Gardner wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Anupam Das wrote:
We are encouraging multiple runs if possible.
Thanks
Anupam
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
>
>> Basically every relay (except Bridges) can help to evaluate the Tor
>> Routes. Please consider that one complete r
Hi Relay Operators,
We have made some modifications to the way we
are running our live scoreboard script. Previously we were running into
some problems with handling multiple simultaneous web requests, as the
server started a heavy script for each incoming request. Now
see on the scoreboard because of some
previous initial test runs executed by others).
So we can say roughly 96 relays participated with 68 of them finishing.
Thanks
Anupam
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Anupam Das wrote:
> So I went through the data collected from the relays I
>
So I went through the data collected from the relays I
Ips used #relays
1 88
13 1
149 1
2 2
28 1
3 1
4 1
5 2
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:53 PM, tor-admin wrote:
> On Sunday 26 January 2014 16:27:12 renke brausse wrote:
> > The needed time (even for the default of scamper with 1000 pps) is
>>I am wondering why only 68 out of 283 completed the traceroute. Can
someone
>>explain please?
I would like to mention that though we received data from 283 different
IPs, it doesn't mean that there are 283 unique relays some of the relays
use dynamic IPs so over time they send data from more tha
rk is
accessible during the runtime of the script.
Thanks for cooperation.
--Anupam
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Mateusz Błaszczyk wrote:
>
> On 20 Jan 2014, at 02:57, Anupam Das wrote:
>
> Dear Tor relay operators,
> We have recently recei
Dear Tor relay operators,
We have recently received a good rate
of participation by relay operators to our measurement project. To give
everyone an idea of the current participation rate we have hosted a live
scoreboard of all our participants, available at
http
ving it in the framework of the
>> automated abuse reports. Instead I will put the info about what I do
>> into the trouble ticket of the abuse message and put a strong plea to
>> contact me about if and how they can stop flagging it as abuse.
>>
>> Best regards
Hi Alex,
We are very sorry to hear about the problems our measurements caused. Up
until yesterday, we had received no reports of them triggering these kinds
of responses from providers. However, yesterday we heard a very similar
story from another relay operator using Hetzner.
Thanks for sharing
12 matches
Mail list logo
