-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about non exit operators? Are they also welcome?
BR
Felix
On 12/02/2013 01:46 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Torservers.net invites Tor exit relay operators and organizations to a
> meetup. If possible/relevant, for example if you're a member of on
FYI:
Yoriz informed me about an issue with my mail signing (bad signature).
It turns out that there was a problem with the mail encoding. So, no
need for increased paranoia :-)
On 12/02/2013 07:48 PM, Felix Büdenhölzer wrote:
>
> What about non exit operators? Are they also welcome?
> B
Same thing for me. I have asked the donation guys by writing a short
mail to donati...@torproject.org and they replied with the link to the
shirt supplier.
FB
On 12/25/2013 01:23 PM, equal-rights.de wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i noticed a problem with tor weather. I should have recieved a email
> that I qua
>I am unsure right now why exactly a bridge
>should not be listed respectively list a family, other than you leak the
>existence of the bridge(s).
Actually this is the exact and only reason. From the DOC:
"Do not list any bridge relay as it would compromise its concealment"
So, dont list t
> *However*, if there's a way to specify the data it sends back, that
> wouldn't be a problem (I'm no legal specialist though). I have not yet
> tested my theory, but sending a few extra bytes in the heartbeat
> message (and of course incrementing 'length' in the 'ssl3_record_st'
> struct) should
