Re: [tor-relays] DoS stats from exits running 0.3.3.2-alpha

Hello, Here's the DoS log line after a few days: [notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 500 single hop clients refused. On 16/02/18 18:23, nusenu wrote: > I was wondering if these unfriendly tor clients are using tor's default >

Re: [tor-relays] Increased cpu usage

Hello, I upgraded 4 exits yesterday and apart from one of them suffering a DDoS, I don't observe any large CPU increase. Maybe your upgrade coincides with the recent overload of create cells? https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24716 Worth to keep an eye on it, anyway. Best,

Re: [tor-relays] Relays operators meetup @ FOSDEM 2018 ?

Up :) Thanks for the initiative ! Le 13/01/18 à 00:07, Nicolas Braud-Santoni a écrit : Hi, I might be able to organise a relays operators meetup at FOSDEM, early February. (This is contingent on me being able to come, though.) I wanted to ask whether there are other relay operators who are

Re: [tor-relays] Combined relay and hidden service, good idea or not?

Hey Tortilla, Sorry for the late reply: On 2018-01-05 21:13, Tortilla wrote: The issue is fixed by adding the above warning message: if you care about your hidden service's "hidden" property, do not run a relay on the same process. Would you mind elaborating? As I read the tracker link, the

Re: [tor-relays] Combined relay and hidden service, good idea or not?

Hey, On 2018-01-05 04:08, torti...@mantablue.com wrote: When operating a hidden service and a relay in one tor instance, tor currently warns: [warn] Tor is currently configured as a relay and a hidden service. That's not very secure: you should probably run your hidden service in a separate

Re: [tor-relays] Image asset in Tor readme html

On 2017-12-20 03:52, teor wrote: On 20 Dec 2017, at 12:59, Fabian A. Santiago wrote: Can the Tor service not serve up a locally referenced PNG file in the readme HTML file used for dirportfrontpage? Mine keeps showing as a broken link. Tor doesn't have this

[tor-relays] OVH down

Hi all, A quick look this morning (UTC+1) at AS16276 (https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/as:AS16276) is a good example why we need more network diversity :-) ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Exit / Bad Gateway

Hello, Same for my exit. I just count that 220 exit relays over 869 have their Consensus Weight at 20. Best, Florentin On 2017-06-27 12:49, Logforme wrote: On 2017-06-27 12:35:21, "Sebastian Urbach" wrote: Dear list, My Exit:

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

Le 22/05/17 à 20:29, tor-relay.d...@o.banes.ch a écrit : Dear all, we are operating two exit nodes with each two tor processes out of Switzerland. The nodes worked quite stable until about 2-3 weeks ago. Since then we experience frequent disruptions (Up to several times a day). This is

Re: [tor-relays] Aggressive abuse report

e strictly prohibited in our network/servers.// //Please take immediate actions to stop this kind of activity./ I am almost sure that trying to argument that I am not responsible for the traffic generated through my Exit is not the right angle with such guy. Any ideas ? Best, Florentin Rochet

[tor-relays] Aggressive abuse report

ted in our network/servers.// //Please take immediate actions to stop this kind of activity./ I am almost sure that trying to argument that I am not responsible for the traffic generated through my Exit is not the right angle with such guy. Any ideas ? Best, Florentin Rochet