:
cakkunmykgxkt1oebv5lft9edqlhvajsbxv7qkhqn6dcbpuj...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Jesse Victors
jvict...@jessevictors.com wrote:
I run some relays and an exit in a university setting. The nodes are in the
same /8 block and are physically close to one another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Hey everyone,
I run some relays and an exit in a university setting. The nodes are in the
same /8 block and are physically close to one another as well. Is there any
advantage in turning one of the relays into another exit? This is something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Hey guys,
Today on Reddit I saw a post on /r/Tor that listed the number of relays by
version, which was pretty cool. While OP apparently loaded the information into
SQLite and selected the count, there's another way to do it:
sudo cat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
I don't know about that. The number of site that ban all Tor nodes (exits and
non-exits alike) is relatively low compared to the number of websites that
don't. The banning happens when trigger-happy sysadmins think that 1) IP
address == user,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hey guys,
I've been running some exit nodes for some time now, and they're doing well.
They've burned through many terabytes of bandwidth, and thanks to Tor's
recommended reduced exit policy, complaints have been minimal. Clearly the vast
Hello everyone,
I run
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/1946F5E4748B069D3B989B5AF50C7DDD3AC61859
and from the graphs it's clear that the traffic has roughly leveled off, rather
than continue to climb. I generated a new key after Heartbleed, so it's been up
for nearly three months. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks. I saw the OpenSSL update, but thanks for explaining what it was about.
Is it necessary to restart Tor to apply the update?
Jesse V.
On 06/06/2014 04:00 AM, tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 05 Jun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Ok, will do, thanks.
On 06/06/2014 07:10 AM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
Yes, please restart Tor after updating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I prefer ps aux | grep tor and then you can seem them running side by
side. You can also seem them on htop, which I prefer over top. My init.d
script sets a different log file to each instance, allowing you to
monitor the logs of each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Yes, it's better to have faster relays. However, if you are setting up a
relay or exit on a gigabit connection it may take some time before you
see significant utilization of the pipe. By running two Tor instances at
once you can increase the
In case anyone is interested in running two Tor instances (regular,
bridge, relay, exit) on one machine, I've successfully made an init.d
script to do just that. From searches on Google it looks like others
have asked about this in the past, so I'm sharing this for them. Tor
only allows two Tor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Saw this article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-consumers.html
The U.S. National Security Agency knew for at least two years about a
flaw in the way that many websites send sensitive
FYI: Just got this to my Tor relay mail address, with a zip file
attached extracting to a '.scr' win exe. Curiously routed via a .gov.uk
mail relay...
GB03022014.scr: PE32 executable (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows
MD5: dba1e52929f6ca9d1a1bf87e4ff469cf GB2546241.zip
MD5:
Thanks again guys for the help. usuexit is now online, and should be
functioning properly, but there seem to be a few mystifying issues:
1) TorStatus marks it as hibernating which it clearly isn't; it's
online and accepting connections. I'm not sure what made TorStatus think
it was offline.
2)
Hello everyone,
I'm thinking about setting up an exit here at my university here in the
US. My ISP has no problem with Tor relays on the fast connections, but I
haven't inquired about exits. I'd be running the exit on a surplus
computer that I have control over in a lab in one of the main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
That's where you come in. To figure out where traffic travels from
your relay, we'd like you to run a bunch of traceroutes - network
measurements that show the paths traffic takes. This is a one-time
experiment for now, but, depending on what
On 10/19/2013 06:00 AM, tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 00:55:42 -0400
From: Torop to...@optonline.net
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] My Relay speed has dropped nearly to zero -
Why?
Message-ID:
/plain; charset=utf-8
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 23:40 -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
On 13-10-08 03:23 PM, Jesse Victors wrote:
...
obviously has implications into other Tor users, the vast majority of
whom use Tor for legal and proper activities.
Could you give some evidence for what vast majority
I recently ran across several articles related to the NSA's attempts at
cracking Tor and de-anonymizing its users. They are after terrorists and
other individuals who seek to do harm of course, but their work
obviously has implications into other Tor users, the vast majority of
whom use Tor for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:54:34 +0300
From: J.C. j...@riseup.net
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-relays] Future versions and Vidalia?
Message-ID: 52400fda.2060...@riseup.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As I am trying to avoid using too many IPs (IPv4 is constrainted, IPv6
is not, but the latter won't get much traffic), I'll try if I can get my
tcp-balancer idea setup in the run of next week (low on spare cycles at
the moment) and then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello everyone, newcomer here.
I'm behind very fast connection (11.5 MB/sec down, 7.5 MB/sec up) and I
thought that the Tor network could benefit from my connection,
especially since it's apparently been under high load recently. Per the
latest
(Most folks would just call that 100mbit, that is if your MB is
MegaByte, hence why 11.5 MiB/s would be more accurate).
Yes, it is megabytes/sec, according to Speedtest.net. Most sysadmins
would say 91.74 mbit down, 60.23 mbit up, (which is as you say basically
100 mbit) but since the Tor
23 matches
Mail list logo
