Re: [tor-relays] Tor at Defcon 32, Las Vegas (August 8 – August 11, 2024)

I will absolutely be there and volunteering! > On Aug 1, 2024, at 13:20, gus wrote: > > Hello, > > A few Tor people & relay operators will be attending Defcon this year! > > Stop by the Tor booth to meet the team and check out new Tor merch: > https://x.com/see_ess/status/1817593609123926047.

Re: [tor-relays] (Invitation) Join us! Tor Relay Operator Meetup - October 22, 2022 - 1900 UTC

I am in an airport, i will try to participate. On Oct 22, 2022, at 11:30, gus wrote: Hello, We're meeting today, October 22, at 19UTC (in 30 minutes). See you soon! Gus On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 05:46:09PM -0300, gus wrote: Dear relay operators, The next Tor relay operator meetup will happen

Re: [tor-relays] EOL 2 x relay

Anders, Thank you for running exit relays! @aquintex > On Jun 3, 2022, at 01:43, Anders Burmeister via tor-relays > wrote: > >  > Hi Heroes > > I’m sorry to inform you, that my two relays will discontinue and no longer > participating from 28 july 2022. > > Had a lot of fun here. > > F

Re: [tor-relays] Responding to Tor censorship in Russia

:24PM +0000, John Ricketts wrote: gus, Since all of my exit nodes are within the same /16 - would I have to run bridges on newly acquired IPv4 space? John -Original Message- From: tor-relays On Behalf Of gus Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:16 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Su

Re: [tor-relays] Responding to Tor censorship in Russia

That's what I was thinking... I run 100 exit nodes. I'd like to get more opinions. -Original Message- From: tor-relays On Behalf Of Felix Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 8:04 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Responding to Tor censorship in Russia Hi >

Re: [tor-relays] Responding to Tor censorship in Russia

gus, Since all of my exit nodes are within the same /16 - would I have to run bridges on newly acquired IPv4 space? John -Original Message- From: tor-relays On Behalf Of gus Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:16 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: [tor-relays] Responding to

Re: [tor-relays] Relay consensus weight drop

Thank you. I also have been experiencing this problem. :-) > On Jun 25, 2021, at 14:54, Georg Koppen wrote: > > Georg Koppen: >> mikefloyd2: >>> Following further decline of my server's consensus weight, I looked around >>> a bit. >>> I found some more servers that show similar behavior in t

Re: [tor-relays] Tor project helping to attempt to cancel Richard Stallman

I'll match that. > On Mar 25, 2021, at 14:37, niftybunny > wrote: > > I will spin up 2 relays for every relay this guy and other RMS supporters > will shut down. > > nifty > > >> On 25. Mar 2021, at 20:11, Igor Mitrofanov >> wrote: >> >> I denounce the Tor Project's political activism

Re: [tor-relays] OrNetStats: Operator Level Graphs added

Thank you!!! > On Jan 9, 2021, at 14:39, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > I've added new operator level pages with an > interactive graph showing the aggregated guard/exit probability and > advertised bandwidth over time across all relays for a given operator. > > This should allow you to see wheth

Re: [tor-relays] anyone else with this issue?

I as well. On Aug 25, 2020, at 13:45, niftybunny wrote: ?Daily DDOS love the last 14 days ... https://imgur.com/a/rfu0OUA even for my standards, thats a shit-ton of sockets ... Tor DDOS protection is configured but I get more connections than I can drop ... nifty

Re: [tor-relays] Noticeable Increase in Abuse Traffic

here ramping up. For now I setup a mail rule > to forward them to a different mailbox inside my email. > > Thanks, > John Csuti > >> On Jul 18, 2020, at 8:43 PM, John Ricketts wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I'm getting about 4x the abuse traffic tha

Re: [tor-relays] Noticeable Increase in Abuse Traffic

all the exits I used to own ran under my own IP range > and abuse contact, so abuse mails just went directly to spam unless it > was actual GOVT requests. I have received more subpoena than regular in the last two months. > > 2020-07-19 0:36 GMT, John Ricketts : >> All, >> >

[tor-relays] Noticeable Increase in Abuse Traffic

All, I'm getting about 4x the abuse traffic that I normally get from running exits. Anyone else noticing this trend? John Ricketts Quintex Alliance Consulting ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torprojec

Re: [tor-relays] relayor v20.0.2

Thanks! > On May 29, 2020, at 08:26, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > relayor v20.0.2 is released. > > relayor helps you with running tor relays with minimal effort (automate > everything). > > https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor > > Changes > --- > > - add support for OpenBSD 6.7 > -

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?

Thank you for your thoughts. :) > On Feb 1, 2020, at 20:05, "starlight.201...@binnacle.cx" > wrote: > > The rating shift experienced by your relays and many others is likely a > consequence of the gradual phase-in of the SBWS scanner implementation in > place of TorFlow. I for one find SWBS

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay by the Chaos Computer Club Vienna (C3W)

Awesome, thanks for yet another relay! :-) > On Jan 23, 2020, at 05:38, MacLemon wrote: > > Hi! > > I just wanted to convey some happy news: > > The Chaos Computer Club Vienna[0] (C3W, Vienna/Austria) just launched their > second relay. We're still working on tweaking the bandwidth announcem

Re: [tor-relays] Introducing: The Onion Pack

Thank you Ralph! On Jan 12, 2020, at 15:18, Ralph Wetzel wrote: ? Good evening, I'd like to take the opportunity to introduce 'The Onion Pack', a Tor Relay Bundle for Windows. Intended to lower the effort to setup a Tor relay (or bridge) on a Window

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?

e of total bandwidth available: since your part is fixed and total grows, your fraction reduces. Regards On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 14:04, John Ricketts mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: Hello, I have been watching the consensus weight and bandwidth of all of my 50 exit nodes drop consistently

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?

oralf Förster Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 7:30 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues? On 1/7/20 1:57 PM, John Ricketts wrote: > I have been watching the consensus weight and bandwidth of all of my 50 exit > nodes drop c

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?

It seems disproportionate though. I'm only using 2gbit/sec of my circuit and I have plenty of hardware ceiling left. Feels like i'm doing something else wrong. > On Jan 7, 2020, at 07:30, Toralf Förster wrote: > > On 1/7/20 1:57 PM, John Ricketts wrote: >>

[tor-relays] Consensus Weight Dropping/Authority Issues?

Hello, I have been watching the consensus weight and bandwidth of all of my 50 exit nodes drop consistently over the past few months. I have not made any hardware changes in my data center and actual customers have not complained about any performance issues. Operating systems and Tor version

Re: [tor-relays] Added new relays to my family.

Great work! > On Oct 2, 2019, at 19:18, Jochen wrote: > > Hi, > > just letting everyone know that I've added, in total, 6 new relays to my > family: > > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/family:94C268630BEDCB64E7F8881881A23D053F243C18 > > During the next few weeks expect around

Re: [tor-relays] Very high CPU Load and low Traffic since Sunday

reduction++; > On Aug 19, 2019, at 21:45, niftybunny > wrote: > > Same here +1 > >> On 15. Aug 2019, at 16:43, Tim Niemeyer wrote: >> >> Signed PGP part >> Hello >> >> I've noticed a reduction in tor traffic about 50% since Sunday. The cpu >> load stayed almost same. The amount of TCP Sess

Re: [tor-relays] do not run exits at home

+1 to this. > On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:50, nusenu wrote: > > dns1...@riseup.net: >> Yes, I know. >> >> Keyweb rent IPs, from 9 € per month for 8 IPs. They say that I'd need >> at least a Rv-server. But I don't know how to do. Would be possible >> to use different IPs on my home connection, than

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

Gus, Here are all of the fingerprints for the Quintex Family relays: 0077BCBA7244DB3E6A5ED2746E86170066684887 041646640AB306EA74B001966E86169B04CC88D2 155D6F57425F16C0624D7641E4EB1B47C6F0 1DB25DF59DAA01B5BE3D3CEB8AFED115940EBE8B 1E5136DDC52FAE1219208F0A6BADB0BA62587EE6 2ED4D25766973713EB8C56A

Re: [tor-relays] FallbackDir

Submit your fingerprints to co...@torproject.org :-) > On Apr 7, 2019, at 08:51, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > > Is their a need for any more FallbackDirs? > > Thanks, > > Conrad > > -- > Conrad Rockenhaus > https://www.rockenhaus.com > Cell: (254) 292-3350 > Fax: (254) 875-0459 > _

Re: [tor-relays] High Speed Exit Relay or just a plain Relay?

I think exit. > On Apr 4, 2019, at 11:03, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a FreeBSD box on a 1 Gbit/s connection. I'm trying to determine > if we need more high speed relays or high speed exit relays. The AS > it's on has no plain relays, just exit relays. That's what has me > wo

Re: [tor-relays] Extreme Exit Policy

tropy outweighs any issues for me. John Ricketts Quintex Alliance Consulting > On Dec 17, 2018, at 15:48, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:34:49PM +0000, John Ricketts wrote: >> I am considering only allowing ports 53, 80, and 443 only. Discussion? &g

[tor-relays] Extreme Exit Policy

All, I am considering only allowing ports 53, 80, and 443 only. Discussion? John Ricketts Quintex Alliance Consulting ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Explaining Tor to worried parent

+1 On Nov 12, 2018, at 09:24, niftybunny mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>> wrote: Okay, this is the tldr version, if you want the long version e-mail me at ab...@to-surf.and-protect.net 1. ISPs want to make money, in fact they have to turn in a profit

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie retired

Hear Hear! -Original Message- From: tor-relays On Behalf Of starlight.201...@binnacle.cx Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 12:51 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: [tor-relays] Blutmagie retired The operator of Blutmagie Torstatus, Olaf Selke has retired the service. For yea

Re: [tor-relays] Tor ContactInfo generator

Thank you! -Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Eran Sandler Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 5:53 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: [tor-relays] Tor ContactInfo generator Hi everyone, I've build a small website

Re: [tor-relays] Which would be more helpful, to run a bridge or normal relay?

Thanks for running a bridge! On Oct 11, 2018, at 22:37, Keifer Bly mailto:keifer@gmail.com>> wrote: Thank you, I recently had to swich over to a new relay, I was formerly running a normal relay, but had to switch to a different OS (Windows 10) because Apple dropped support for my hardware,

Re: [tor-relays] Which would be more helpful, to run a bridge or normal relay?

I did add a disclaimer to the fact that others may have a differing opinion. :-) As far as my answer being related to fear, uncertainty, and doubt... in my country (and others) raids have happened to people that have ran exit relays at home. Some of these were done pre-dawn which adds to conf

Re: [tor-relays] Which would be more helpful, to run a bridge or normal relay?

Keifer, Great question. My advice (which may differ from others) would based on the location of your connection. If this is in your home I would become a middle relay or perhaps a bridge. Running an exit relay from home will put you in legal (and potentially physical) danger. If this is a co

Re: [tor-relays] Which would be more helpful, to run a bridge or normal relay?

and what Roger says his answer (and link) is more detailed. > On Oct 11, 2018, at 22:10, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 08:07:38PM -0700, Keifer Bly wrote: >> So I just set up a new relay via the Tor expert bundle and am wondering if >> running a normal relay or a bri

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: overall DNS failure rate above 5% - please check your DNS

Thank you. -Original Message- From: tor-relays On Behalf Of nusenu Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 2:24 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: overall DNS failure rate above 5% - please check your DNS John Ricketts: > I see several of

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: overall DNS failure rate above 5% - please check your DNS

Hey there, I see several of my exit nodes on this list but the DNS failure is 0.0 percent. Is there a hundredths column of failure with me, like 0.05 percent or something? I'm making the list for a reason. Example: 0.0

Re: [tor-relays] Exit node seized

Michael, Why was it seized? If you're wanting to put a new node up I would start from scratch. John > On Sep 12, 2018, at 09:42, "tor-rel...@geek1.de" wrote: > > Hello, > > I've found no information - after short googling - if I should take some > action after an exit node got seized. Like m

Re: [tor-relays] Abuse Complaints

wrote: On 29.08.2018 12:48, John Ricketts wrote: > For the non-automated emails I reply each time. Same here. At one time I had written a generator script that fills in details of the complaining party, like IP addresses, and adds general descriptions about what Tor is, with links to facilit

Re: [tor-relays] Abuse Complaints

Rob, For the non-automated emails I reply each time. John > On Aug 29, 2018, at 05:47, I wrote: > > John > > Do you do anything in reply? > > Rob > > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Abuse Complaints

Paul, On an average day I receive 50 or so automated complaints. Once a week I will get a real human emailing me, even more rare do I get a subpoena. John > On Aug 28, 2018, at 23:38, Paul Templeton wrote: > > Question: are exit operators seeing many abuse complaints now days? I have > on

Re: [tor-relays] [Software Announcement] FamilyGenerator: Tor MyFamily Generator

As a person with 50 relays, I thank you. > On Jul 21, 2018, at 19:29, Neel Chauhan wrote: > > Hi tor-relays mailing list, > > I have created a tool called FamilyGenerator. FamilyGenerator is a tool to > automatically construct a Tor MyFamily line based on Onionoo parameters. > > Why? If you r

Re: [tor-relays] Help! I'm ripping my hair out trying to get Quintex on IPv6 exit

Oh, thank ! I thought I was nuts! I'm fixing to update 49 more clients. Thanks Tim. On May 18, 2018, at 22:47, teor mailto:teor2...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, On 19 May 2018, at 13:24, John Ricketts mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: I've been trying to bring a rel

[tor-relays] Help! I'm ripping my hair out trying to get Quintex on IPv6 exit

All, I've been trying to bring a relay up for testing IPv6. Relay name is QuintexAirVPN1. Metrics website says that the OR Port is unreachable on [2620:7:6000:::c759:df51]:80 - which isn't where I set the ORPort - should be 443... https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/F7447E9

Re: [tor-relays] What's the priority right now?

I'd say exit :-) > On Jan 31, 2018, at 18:59, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > > I’m ready to get node #3 up right now…so what’s the priority for high speed > nodes right now, exits or relays? Just wanted to know before I brought it > online. > > This one is based in the great land of Canada :D. >

Re: [tor-relays] Experimental DoS mitigation is in tor master

Woo, for sure! > On Jan 31, 2018, at 03:16, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Thanks for your patience with the relay overload issues. > > We've merged https://bugs.torproject.org/24902 into tor git master. We'll > be putting out an 0.3.3.2-alpha release in not too long for wider testi

Re: [tor-relays] The Onion Box v4.1

Excellent, thank you. On Jan 14, 2018, at 15:04, Ralph Wetzel mailto:theonion...@gmx.com>> wrote: Good evening! I've released today v4.1 of The Onion Box, the web interface to monitor your Tor nodes in action. Some bugs have been fixed, and the whole package was adapted to be installable fro

Re: [tor-relays] Setting myfamily

Agreed. All of my 50 relays list all relays including itself. > On Jan 4, 2018, at 13:08, Tyler Johnson wrote: > > Each relay only needs to list the other servers in its family; it > doesn’t need to list itself, but it won’t hurt if it does. > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Fabian A. Sant

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

Tim, Oh.. and C5A53BCC174EF8FD0DCB223E4AA929FA557DEDB2 John L. Ricketts, Ph.D. Quintex Alliance Consulting (325) 262-3488 Cell/Signal -Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of teor Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 5:51 PM T

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

Tim, 0077BCBA7244DB3E6A5ED2746E86170066684887 041646640AB306EA74B001966E86169B04CC88D2 155D6F57425F16C0624D7641E4EB1B47C6F0 1AE949967F82BBE7534A3D6BA77A7EBE1CED4369 1DB25DF59DAA01B5BE3D3CEB8AFED115940EBE8B 1E5136DDC52FAE1219208F0A6BADB0BA62587EE6 2ED4D25766973713EB8C56A290BF07E06B85BF12 3687FE

Re: [tor-relays] The Onion Box v4.0

Thank you for all of your hard work! > On Nov 18, 2017, at 05:22, Ralph Wetzel wrote: > > Hi there! > > After a summer full of 'other topics' I've finally released v4.0 of The Onion > Box, the web interface to monitor your Tor nodes in action. > > The main focus of this new release are ex

Re: [tor-relays] Nyx 2.0 Release

Huzzah! > On Nov 6, 2017, at 17:40, Damian Johnson wrote: > > Hi all, after years of being in the works I'm pleased to announce Nyx! > A long overdue modernization of arm. > > http://blog.atagar.com/nyx-release-2-0/ > https://nyx.torproject.org/ > > Even more important for our controller space

Re: [tor-relays] Testers needed for Nyx beta release

You bet! > On Oct 30, 2017, at 14:35, Damian Johnson wrote: > > Hi all! After five years Nyx (previously known as arm) is getting > a far belated update. Under the covers the whole codebase has been > rewritten from scratch, but for users things look much the same. > One of those cases where...

[tor-relays] Quintex Exit Relays

All, I am performing some operating system upgrades and my exit nodes may be down for a period of time. Just a heads up. John ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

Hi, 100Mbps is not a small node. Thanks for running a relay! When you say you're going to spend more money on it... do you mean hardware or bandwidth? All of my relays are running as virtual machines on multiple computers to maximize the CPU and memory usage. If you didn't want to virtualize

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

? John On Sep 26, 2017, at 19:31, Roger Dingledine mailto:a...@mit.edu>> wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:04:28PM +, John Ricketts wrote: I am about to fire up more Exit Relays and if I do so I will jump from my roughly 3% of Exit Probability to what technically could easily reach 6-

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

I respond to them by the method required of the subpoena. Generally they are delivered by E-Mail so I respond to them in kind, explain that I am running a legal Tor Exit Node, explain what Tor is, and point to exonerator.torproject.org showing that that IP add

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

hat chance just unfortunately increased. It would be a shame to get your nodes instant terminated in that event. Be careful ;) On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, John Ricketts mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: Thanks Tim, this is the general idea of "If you build it they will come." I sim

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

Thanks Tim, this is the general idea of "If you build it they will come." I simply don't want to be a risk. John On Sep 22, 2017, at 08:19, teor mailto:teor2...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 22 Sep 2017, at 23:04, John Ricketts mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: All, I

[tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

All, I have brought this question up in meetings in Seattle and other places so some of you may have already heard me ask this question. So, at risk of repeating the question for some... here goes. I am about to fire up more Exit Relays and if I do so I will jump from my roughly 3% of Exit

Re: [tor-relays] Would you also like to have family-level atlas pages?

Roger, The kind folks at Nos Oignons gave me the code. I still have it if you can't find it. https://nos-oignons.net/Services/index.en.html is an example. John On Sep 11, 2017, at 20:55, Roger Dingledine mailto:a...@mit.edu>> wrote: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:10:00PM +, nusenu wrote:

Re: [tor-relays] Would you also like to have family-level atlas pages?

Hi, I certainly would. John > On Sep 11, 2017, at 17:02, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > Iain - the atlas maintainer - asked on twitter if relay operators at the > relay operators meetup in Montreal have feature requests for atlas [1]. > > I suggested family-level pages where an operator of more t

Re: [tor-relays] keepyourprivcay: Introducing a new 100 mbit/s relay

Thank you! On Aug 16, 2017, at 10:22, Keepyourprivacy mailto:keepyourpriv...@protonmail.ch>> wrote: Another 100 mbit/s relay has been added, located in sweden. MyFamily entry set in torrc. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/B92CADBD1E9A2F72E64D7DE5A1BF5B2B30DA7B87 __

Re: [tor-relays] keepyourprivcay: Introducing a new 100 mbit/s relay

Welcome!!! And thank you. On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:13, Keepyourprivacy mailto:keepyourpriv...@protonmail.ch>> wrote: Hello fellow operators of tor relays out there! :) I'd like to introduce my new relay, it's called keepyourprivacy and hosted in the Netherlands, at a provider which is known for

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

turday in the chillout area next to the Crypto and Privacy Village. I'll make a sign or something. Hope to see some people there! On Jul 27, 2017 23:39, "John Ricketts" mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: haha!! > On Jul 27, 2017, at 22:50, Roger Dingledine > mailto:a.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

haha!! > On Jul 27, 2017, at 22:50, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:01:48PM -0700, Joel Cretan wrote: >> If anyone at DEF CON is interested in meeting up, perhaps we could set up a >> meeting time, maybe in/around the Crypto and Privacy Village. Of course >> we're all int

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

I'm interested :-) > On Jul 27, 2017, at 14:55, Joel Cretan wrote: > > Hi relay operators, > > If anyone at DEF CON is interested in meeting up, perhaps we could set up a > meeting time, maybe in/around the Crypto and Privacy Village. Of course we're > all interested in anonymity, so no pre

Re: [tor-relays] Want to help test 'Sandbox 1'? (Linux only)

I will shortly. All of my relays or just one? > On Jun 25, 2017, at 13:21, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm aiming to enable tor's 'Sandbox' feature by default on Debian based > relays starting with the next release of ansible-relayor [1]. > > Before doing so I'd like to collect some feedback fr

Re: [tor-relays] Ahiker shutting down

Thank you for your service to us all. > On Jun 5, 2017, at 15:06, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > Hello, sadly I have to terminate my relay because it seems to interfere > with the quotidian use of my server. I'll look for a way to help the > community in other ways. > > -- > Please *no* private Cc

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

Roger, I have whatever resources you need for testing. Let me know if you would like them. John > On May 22, 2017, at 21:54, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:48:31PM +0200, niftybunny wrote: >> Same with 0.3.0.5. Upgrading to 0.3.0.7 helped on most relays. > > We di

Re: [tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

Roger, Exactly! bahahaha. John > On May 14, 2017, at 17:24, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:54:55PM +0200, niftybunny wrote: >>> Known TOR exit nodes are listed within the Security Intelligence feed of >>> ASA Firepower devices. Enabling this to be blacklisted will prev

Re: [tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

Exactly what I was thinking. On May 14, 2017, at 14:51, niftybunny mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>> wrote: >Known TOR exit nodes are listed within the Security Intelligence feed of ASA >Firepower devices. Enabling this to be blacklisted will prevent outbound >communications to TOR networ

Re: [tor-relays] Hackers

Gareth, Thank you for your response. I can imagine how this could turn into Oil and Gas incident and I certainly wouldn't want that for myself or anyone else. I'm still debating the privacy of CC:ing the group. As the majority of us do, I've received lots of abuse emails but none quite l

Re: [tor-relays] Recent events in Tor-Relay.

Thanks, that's where I was going internally. I will take your advice, it was much needed. > On Mar 29, 2017, at 01:46, Dave Warren wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017, at 23:24, John Ricketts wrote: >> All, >> >> Any suggestions short of a restraining orde

[tor-relays] Recent events in Tor-Relay.

All, Any suggestions short of a restraining order? That was one of the most bizarre interactions I have ever had with anyone on the internet. Thanks for your input, John ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torpro

Re: [tor-relays] Hackers

Great. On Mar 29, 2017, at 01:03, "cont...@gnosticmedia.com<mailto:cont...@gnosticmedia.com>" mailto:cont...@gnosticmedia.com>> wrote: Sure do . From: John Ricketts [mailto:j...@quintex.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 11:02 PM To: cont...@gnosticmedia.com<mailto

Re: [tor-relays] Hackers

Sir, I do not know why you contacted me. You did not tell me what was attacked, when it was attacked, or how it was attacked. Now you're threatening to attack me. Clearly, you are not a reasonable person. Do what you must. My information is public, you know where I live and you have my tele

Re: [tor-relays] Hackers

;> wrote: Now the abuse is sharing my info was a bunch of dark web hackers for contacting an ISP about abuse. That’s sick. Now I do have cause. From: John Ricketts [mailto:j...@quintex.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:46 PM To: cont...@gnosticmedia.com<mailto:cont...@gn

Re: [tor-relays] Hackers

you think. Why are you CCing me to the entire Tor email list? Was I talking to them, or you? From: John Ricketts [mailto:j...@quintex.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:38 PM To: cont...@gnosticmedia.com<mailto:cont...@gnosticmedia.com> Cc: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org<mailto:tor

Re: [tor-relays] Hackers

at 00:28, "cont...@gnosticmedia.com<mailto:cont...@gnosticmedia.com>" mailto:cont...@gnosticmedia.com>> wrote: Thanks for the info. You're still an IP providing frauds, pedophiles, and intelligence agencies access to do illegal attacks and activities. Bunch of cowards t

Re: [tor-relays] Hackers

Hello, It's because i'm running Tor Exit servers. I am an ISP. I will not turn off any of the Tor exit servers because I am not doing anything illegal. If you feel you must file legal action, please do so. If you're not concerned about blocking Tor, why don't you block all of the exit nodes i

Re: [tor-relays] 22% of bridges run by a single entity?

Wow! And I was planning on stopping at 6%... > On Mar 27, 2017, at 10:49, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > is it known that (likely) a single entity is running ~22% of all > bridges? (not the 'ki' bridges [1]) > > I'm not necessarily saying that this is bad, just curious and wondering > if this is

Re: [tor-relays] [FYI] cymrubridge02 maintenance - quick reboot

Thank you for running this bridge!! > On Mar 13, 2017, at 15:50, Sina Rabbani wrote: > > Dear Team, > > cymrubridge02 (meek-azure) needs a reboot, it's going to be down for > less than a min and will come right back up. >> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/8F4541EEE3F2306B7B9FEF1795EC302F6B

Re: [tor-relays] Is there a logical limit of MyFamily members?

Thank you. :-) > On Feb 25, 2017, at 03:01, nusenu wrote: > > > > John Ricketts: >> I have 30 nodes now and my year end I intend to run enough to reach >> 6% of exit probability. I want to know if there is a logical limit >> per family. > > There i

[tor-relays] Is there a logical limit of MyFamily members?

All, I have 30 nodes now and my year end I intend to run enough to reach 6% of exit probability. I want to know if there is a logical limit per family. Thanks! John ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.o

Re: [tor-relays] Shutdown of TorLand1

Thank you for your service to the community! > On Feb 15, 2017, at 14:05, "tor-ad...@torland.is" > wrote: > > reduced ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] My first relay is running

Now wait! May i recommend reading this: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay Welcome to the family! On Feb 13, 2017, at 08:40, Juan Guillermo Narvaez mailto:guille...@nrvz.net>> wrote: Hello everyone! I'm start running my Tor relay today. Now what? =) -- J. Guillermo Na

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

Hear, hear! On Feb 8, 2017, at 02:06, DaKnOb mailto:dak...@daknob.net>> wrote: Incidentally yesterday I published a blog post featuring them and why their abuse e-mails are plain spam: https://blog.daknob.net/security-companies-and-abuse-e-mails/ On 08 Feb 2017, at 06:00, Andrew Deason mailt

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

All, I will be blunt and say that I simply ignore them. athey are fully aware of what Tor is, have been told by me and other operators how to block exit nodes and explain that we are simply a conduit. I am not ignoring them out of spite, but frankly it is tiring to be redundant. I get abou

Re: [tor-relays] The Onion Box v3.2: Web Interface for your Tor relay

Ralph, Thank you for providing this code. I am about to add 20 more relays and this really helps. John From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Wetzel Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:36 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-rela

Re: [tor-relays] ae rises and rises

Excellent! > On Jan 29, 2017, at 04:57, Felix wrote: > > Please check out > > https:// > metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2015-10-22&end=2017-01-29&country=ae&events=off > > vs > > https:// > metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2015-10-22&end=2

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

medov wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 03:40:05 + > John Ricketts wrote: > >> It is entirely possible this is a result of the HE vs Cogent feud, big break >> in the IPv6 routing tables as a cogent is refusing to peer with HE. Not >> sure where they are in th

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

If you want an ELI5, explain your request like I'm five years old. On 24 Jan 2017, at 04:40, John Ricketts mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: It is entirely possible this is a result of the HE vs Cogent feud, big break in the IPv6 routing tables as a cogent is refusing to peer with HE.

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

request like I'm five years old. On 24 Jan 2017, at 04:40, John Ricketts mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: It is entirely possible this is a result of the HE vs Cogent feud, big break in the IPv6 routing tables as a cogent is refusing to peer with HE. Not sure where they are in that n

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

It is entirely possible this is a result of the HE vs Cogent feud, big break in the IPv6 routing tables as a cogent is refusing to peer with HE. Not sure where they are in that negotiation... > On Jan 23, 2017, at 21:38, teor wrote: > > >> On 24 Jan 2017, at 14:31, niftybunny wrote: >> >>

Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX

Patrick, I run all of my relays under VMware and I don't have any issues at all. How many CPUs do you have in the physical server and how many virtual CPUs do you have assigned to the VM? John On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:19, Patrick DERWAEL mailto:patr...@derwael.be>> wrote: Hi guys, I'm runnin

Re: [tor-relays] Call for Tor Fallback Directories

Tim, Did you receive email from me directly to your gmail account? John > On Dec 4, 2016, at 04:45, teor wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Dear Tor Relay Operator, > > Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a > fallback directory mi

Re: [tor-relays] Guard before Stable flag?

Thank you Roger. > On Nov 3, 2016, at 01:01, Roger Dingledine wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 12:42:18PM +, John Ricketts wrote: >> When looking at my list on Atlas (21 entries) I'm seeing that some of my >> relays are getting the Guard flag before the

Re: [tor-relays] Guard before Stable flag?

Thanks Tim :) > On Nov 2, 2016, at 16:28, teor wrote: > > >> On 2 Nov. 2016, at 23:42, John Ricketts wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> >> When looking at my list on Atlas (21 entries) I'm seeing that some of my >> relays are getting the

  1   2   >