[tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

power devices. Enabling this to be blacklisted will prevent outbound communications to TOR networks." <>< Jon L. Gardner Mobile: +1 979-574-1189 Email/Skype/Jabber: j...@brazoslink.net AIM/iChat/MSN: j...@mac.com___ tor-relays mail

Re: [tor-relays] Intrusion Prevention System Software - Snort or Suricata

y that Tor is actually doing something proactive about abuse. Tor claims to operate like a specialized ISP, and any good ISP protects its own servers. Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] The Onion Box: A web based status monitor for Tor relays

Clicking on the nk is wrong some way... By copy and paste the URL, I was able to get the page to not have an error On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Jon wrote: > Still giving 403 error - > Ups, hier hat sich ein > Fehler eingeschlichen... > > Fehler-Code: 403 > > > Wo

Re: [tor-relays] The Onion Box: A web based status monitor for Tor relays

Still giving 403 error - Ups, hier hat sich ein Fehler eingeschlichen... Fehler-Code: 403 Would love to check it out :) This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by

Re: [tor-relays] Slow relay speeds for Australian geographic location(s)

Jeremy, Yea I noticed that too. So, I ended up putting them all on different IP's. Working well so far. Cheers, Jon On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Jon Daniels wrote: > > > Recently I turned up ni

Re: [tor-relays] Slow relay speeds for Australian geographic location(s)

network. Recently I turned up nineteen additional nodes on that server and they're averaging 60Mbps of overall throughput. CPU load is still 0.00. -Jon On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Mathew wrote: > Hello all, > > I run a non-exit relay in Australia. My relay has been running

Re: [tor-relays] Bandwidth not being used by Tor on Gigabit dedicated server

ow for sure such thing is not implemented there, don't really >> know what to say. CPU / RAM and Network interface is all you can test >> to see if it is the bottleneck for Tor. If all these are off the list, >> there is something upstream you. >> >> I repeat,

[tor-relays] Bandwidth not being used by Tor on Gigabit dedicated server

built both servers. The network is at less than 15% capacity, 99% of the time. CPU load is always at 0.00. Based in the USA, west coast. Ideas? Is there simply less demand for tor traffic in the US? Cheers, Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] Exit policies pointing to IP blocks not appearing on Globe

our arrangement with your ISP, but if you're running an exit relay, it would be optimal to run it on its own public IP, so all of the exit traffic is completely separated from any other traffic on the host (or your NATted public IP). You can use the

Re: [tor-relays] Mac OSX 10.6, re-installed, TBB downloaded, installed?, terminal window....what now?

, if you want to run a bridge or relay, the easiest method is probably to use MacPorts or Homebrew, as documented here: https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-osx.html.en FWIW, I've been running a Tor exit relay on Mac OS X 10.6.8 for many years. Jon ___

Re: [tor-relays] Trusted Tor Traceroute Scoreboard Link Modified

er 10.6.8, and it's still running. I can't tell that it's doing anything, and the exit's IP doesn't appear in your stats. Not sure what's wrong. Do I need to restart it in debug mode? Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-re

[tor-relays] (no subject)

___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] exit and skype

s will magically disappear after a few days. Using a VPN *might* work, but Microsoft blocks access from many of those too. Complaining to Microsoft, especially if you're a paying Skype customer, might not help, but it can't hurt. Jon __

Re: [tor-relays] Admin panel compromised

Yoriz, I also concur with the previous reply at the way you are handling the situation. I hope you get back up and running soon. Thanks for running an exit. Jon On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Yoriz wrote: > For your info: > > I am the operator of the "privshield" exit

Re: [tor-relays] new relays

logy non grata" in so many places, to so many people that would otherwise fully support its mission. Hugs, Jon signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https:

Re: [tor-relays] new relays

to address at least some of the most egregious abuses of Tor--things like child porn, or even porn in general, that either have nothing to do with Tor's foundational mission, or (like child porn) are antithetical to it--the result would be greater public support for the technology, and a wid

Re: [tor-relays] Increase of number of new relays and exit nodes

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 18.08.2013 20:34, Jon wrote: > > I have noticed over the past several months that the amount my exit > > relay was being used has drastically dropped as the new relays and new > > exits have come onl

[tor-relays] Increase of number of new relays and exit nodes

online. Is this normal to see my usage drop noticeably? Is this going to be a continuing trend as new relays and exits join with what we already have, that some relays / exits will see a lower usage from their nodes? Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor

Re: [tor-relays] Local problem or Authority problem?

/server/d/ > shorten original - I have also gotten the same message ' Warning ' past 3 days, " while fetching "/tor/server/authorityz " I'll try again soon. Though it is a different server IP Address. Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Possible bug on Tor 0.2.4.8-alpha and 0.2.4.9-alpha

I started the Tor alpha yesterday, and now have numerous instances of " " Bug/Attack: unexpected sendme cell from client. Closing circ." Anything to be concened about Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torpr

Re: [tor-relays] Min. Bandwidth for Bridge Relay?

nection, but can use a business connection, all from home, which also will increase their available bandwidth. Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays

esent on a dedicated server is at very minimal usage.. Just food for thought :) Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] How to Run Torservers.net

t the complaints, I had expeted more and was worried how I was going to handle it. I have been greatly surprised that it has been as few as it is. In my case I would say no more than total of 10-15 complaints in 2 1/2 years in running a full exit relay. Jon __

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > Thus spake Jon (torance...@gmail.com): > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mike Perry >wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:29:54 -0500 > > > > Jon allegedly wrote: > > > >

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > Thus spake mick (m...@rlogin.net): > > > On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:29:54 -0500 > > Jon allegedly wrote: > > > > > Yep same here, got notice today from ISP on a report of the 20th for > > > alledged hackin

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

--- > > > > > Yep same here, got notice today from ISP on a report of the 20th for alledged hacking with someone using sqlmap. the reporting ip was a brazilian gov ip address. I just blocked the port and kept on serving Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Bandwidth Authority PID Feedback Experiment #2 Starting

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > Thus spake Jon (torance...@gmail.com): > >>  In adding further info on the topic, I have noticed and looked back >> over the past couple of weeks and have seen a drop of of usage of >> about 43% s of today. I am not

Re: [tor-relays] Bandwidth Authority PID Feedback Experiment #2 Starting

when the alpha doesn't appear to have any bugs ) Good work guys and gals!! Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Logs full of "eventdns: All nameservers have failed"

for server or for regular usage. I might be more concerned if the time lapse was several minutes or more than 100th's of a second Jon ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] max / burst speed

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Andreas Reich wrote: > well, i dont know exactly but since there are more middle then exit nodes > maybe there is no need for larger bandwiths ... > > My middle node has a maxbandwith of 250 KBytes and isnt under full load > either. > > So far i dont have any idea