Re: [tor-relays] Monitoring multiple relays

Hi, if you have a few relays I would go "the professional way" and set up an Icinga 2 server. If you combine Icinga 2 with a graphing tool like Graphite you can also produce nice graphs. You can monitor the whole server (CPU, RAM, disk space, Tor bandwidth, etc) and get alarmed when something is

Re: [tor-relays] British Airways website blocking non exit relays IPs?

Have to revert my statement! On my real exit IP I also get that error. Sorry. Am 20.05.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner: > On my home connection (no Tor involved) I can access the site. However > on my exit IP I can also access the page :-) > > Am 20.05.2016 um 13:35 s

Re: [tor-relays] British Airways website blocking non exit relays IPs?

On my home connection (no Tor involved) I can access the site. However on my exit IP I can also access the page :-) Am 20.05.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Roman Mamedov: > On Fri, 20 May 2016 12:18:01 +0100 > Pascal Terjan wrote: > >> I am now wondering is this is because I run a (non

Re: [tor-relays] British Airways website blocking non exit relays IPs?

Hi, there are some reports that some website operators block all IPs which host Tor nodes. They don't differ between Exit- and Non-Exit Relays. ~Josef Am 20.05.2016 um 13:25 schrieb Pascal Terjan: > Yes > > On 20 May 2016 at 12:21, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner <he...@veloc1ty.de&g

[tor-relays] Announcing a shutdown of a relay

Hi @all, can I announce the shutdown of my relay to the network so clients select a new guard? Thanks, ~Josef signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] CVE-2015-7547 Tor network stats

Hi, you say that 64% of the guard relays and 51% of the exit relaysare are unpatched ? That's horrible! ~Josef Am 22.02.2016 um 23:44 schrieb nusenu: > Hi, > > if we assume for simplicity that every relay running Linux that has not > rebooted since 2016-02-16 is vulnerable to CVE-2015-7547,

Re: [tor-relays] Webiron

Hi, you ISP opened that ticket so you answer the ISP. ~Josef Am 29.01.2016 um 03:31 schrieb 12xBTM: > My ISP just sent a ticket to me about the Webiron abuse, should I just > respond to the ISP? Or do I dare actually load that webiron site? > > On 26.1.16 23:10, Nicholas Suan wrote: >> Looks

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

Hello Dirk, mtr or downloading Ubuntu is not a valid task to check your network connectivity. Your server may has a connection speed of 1 GBit/s but that not the traffic you can push the whole time. It depends on multiple factors. For example: I've a dedicated server in the netherlands with 1

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Yeah I see the probleme: Your didn't provide any Config extract nor logs nor other stuff like that. Provide your config to see if you made an unix socket or a network socket or if you set any password. If you set up a network listener please provide netstat output. Maybe a dumb question: Have you

Re: [tor-relays] Nagios/Icinga plugin check_tor_bandwidth for gathering bandwidth data

Hi Tim, you hit me hard today because I didn't think about the privacy of the users :-) But the data points for read and write are just average values and the time series database also only stores the average values. So I don't think that just by looking at the graph you can track specific Hidden

Re: [tor-relays] webiron requesting to block several /24 subnet

Maybe something to add because I ran into a mistake: ExitPolicy is a first match szenario. The reject rules for abuse reports and stuff has to be the first one, afterwards your accept rules and then a reject *:*. For exampe my current policy is: ExitPolicy reject 5.133.182.0/24 # WebIron report

Re: [tor-relays] webiron requesting to block several /24 subnet

Hi Christian, sorry, I marked that message as "Todo" but forgot :-) My replay to my provider is: - Hello Martin, I've blocked the whole /24 (originally the target IP range is inside a /16 but this would be too much) to prevent further

Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy reject fails

Hi @all, so I reviewed my whole ExitPolicy statements and now I understand the probleme: The first rule match wins. And because traffic to port 80 was accepted for every source the reject rule for the subnet was ignored. Thanks for the hint! ~Josef Am 19.10.2015 um 23:43 schrieb teor: >> On 20

Re: [tor-relays] new exit node

r is against the idea of the proxy being just a carrier ? > > TY > > Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner: >> Hello, >> >> add some family information and it should be fine. >> Are you sure you want to open port 22? >> >> ~Josef >> >> Am 25.09.2015 um

Re: [tor-relays] new exit node

Hello, add some family information and it should be fine. Are you sure you want to open port 22? ~Josef Am 25.09.2015 um 12:00 schrieb supp...@ruggedinbox.com: > Hi we are running from few hours a new Tor exit node: 87.120.37.163 > aka tor-exit-node-01.cryptonoid.com > aka cryptonoid.com > > We

Re: [tor-relays] False exit abuse from server4you

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's. Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb Dr. Who dr...@posteo.is: Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday: Dear Customer, we've

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus weight dropped

Hello List, at this point I want to thank Bram de Boer for spending an unmetered server. Dediacted servers with unmetered network is not cheap and should be treated differently as a virtual server at OVH. I can totally agree why he is disappointed about that. Just deleting the identity is not a

Re: [tor-relays] Tor in Spain

Hello Torizen, I don't think that they ment the law. Check the ToS of EDIS to see if it's true. ~Josef Am 09.01.2015 um 13:00 schrieb Torizen: Hello, I've been running a non-exit relay on a EDIS VPS located in Spain for 5 months. Yesterday, without warning, I received an email because

Re: [tor-relays] Tor in Spain

Am 09.01.2015 um 13:20 schrieb Torizen: Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner: Hello Torizen, I don't think that they ment the law. Check the ToS of EDIS to see if it's true. ~Josef Am 09.01.2015 um 13:00 schrieb Torizen: Hello, I've been running a non-exit relay on a EDIS VPS located in Spain

Re: [tor-relays] new VPS bridge bandwidth under-reported

What's the fingerprint of your bridge or what's the uptime? When I setup my relay the shown bandwidth was first low and increased since then to full declared speed. ~Josef Am 05.01.2015 um 11:39 schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: Oops. The rate limit I quoted is actually the limit on the

Re: [tor-relays] new VPS bridge bandwidth under-reported

I don't have that much knowledge on bridges, but I think it's the same as with relays: The speed increases after some time. I'm running 29E3D95332812F81F67FF31B3B1B842683D1C309 and as you can see from the graphs the speed increased slowly after the start. On saturday I increased the advertised

Re: [tor-relays] new VPS bridge bandwidth under-reported

I know. That's why I said that I don't have that much knowledge about bridges but think that they are treated like relays. Am 05.01.2015 um 12:18 schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: BTW you are running normal Tor public relay rather than a Bridge. At 12:05 1/5/2015 +0100, Josef 'veloc1ty

Re: [tor-relays] new VPS bridge bandwidth under-reported

I meant treated like relays in relation to traffic ... Am 05.01.2015 um 13:22 schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: Unquestionably Bridges are different. Suggest you read about it--lots of info to be found. At 13:08 1/5/2015 +0100, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote: I know. That's why I

Re: [tor-relays] new VPS bridge bandwidth under-reported

That's what 'we' found out now :-) Am 05.01.2015 um 13:50 schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: Apparently not. At 13:25 1/5/2015 +0100, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote: I meant treated like relays in relation to traffic ... ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: [tor-talk] please advise on renting a gigabit capable dedicated server

I have a question. Do you mean with to go shopping for a server buying hardware yourself and rent rackspace or searching for an offer of a dedicated server? Am 05.01.2015 um 15:14 schrieb Mike Perry: Libertas: Hi tor users, my coworkers and I are considering getting together to run a gigabit

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: [tor-talk] please advise on renting a gigabit capable dedicated server

. BTW: If this was too much advertisement I want to apologize. ~Josef Am 05.01.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner: I have a question. Do you mean with to go shopping for a server buying hardware yourself and rent rackspace or searching for an offer of a dedicated server? Am

Re: [tor-relays] Relay is down

Hello Gio, after googling Authdir is rejecting routers in this range. I found this Trac-Ticket: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12661 Maybe your probleme is described in there. ~Josef Am 30.12.2014 um 22:22 schrieb Giovanny Andres Gongora Granada: Authdir is rejecting routers

Re: [tor-relays] Relay is down

Hi List, maybe it's a little bit off-topic but how many authoritative directory servers exist? ~Josef Am 30.12.2014 um 23:37 schrieb Matthew Puckey: On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:39:15 -0500 Giovanny Andres Gongora Granada gio...@gmail.com wrote: So, my relay will be down for ever? I need to move

Re: [tor-relays] OT: folding@home

I recently asked if there is an headless application for it. I got the answer that that something like that exists and after some scrolling I found it on the page. But I never got it to run so I lost interest in it. If you found a way to get it to work please notify me :-) ~Josef Am 27.12.2014

Re: [tor-relays] OT: folding@home

Seems like you have to use a graphical environment. Is there any client for headless installations? ~Josef Am 26.12.2014 um 23:09 schrieb Larry Brandt: This is a worthwhile project aimed at diseases such as cancer, Alzheimers, Parkinson's. Takes little internet bandwidth and only 600 MB