On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 07:42 -0700, kbesig wrote:
1. As non-admin: /usr/bin/vidalia
(process:540): GConf-WARNING **: Client failed to connect to the D-BUS
daemon:
An AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to
this recipient, 0 matched rules; type=method_call,
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 06:26 -0500, Tom Ritter wrote:
On 6 February 2014 14:51, Thomas Themel tho...@themel.com wrote:
Hi,
Luther Blissett (lbliss...@paranoici.org) wrote on 2014-02-06:
1. When you access the clearnet you need dns name resolving which need
to be proxyfied to avoid dns
For reference:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en#ubuntu
This page describes the proper method of sync'n your sources.list file
with Tor project's repos.
--
010
001
111
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 13:40 -0800, I wrote:
Luther,
Following that page's help has allowed me to get mulitple VPSs working for
Tor but I am asking what to do when apt-get update or yum update doesn't get
the newer version of Tor.
How an update can be forced is the question.
(The
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 19:55 -0500, Jeroen Massar wrote:
PS: Try doing a packet sniff on a link with thousands of connections and
where your user cannot tell you what source IP they have; next to the
fact that they might just be using the wrong destination host... ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 14:00 +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2013-11-06 13:47 , mick wrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:00:09 +0200
Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com allegedly wrote:
On 11/06/2013 01:26 PM, mick wrote:
I disagree. Dropping all traffic other than that which is
explicitly
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 09:36 +0100, jj tor wrote:
Sorry for the confusión, the exact line in my torrc is Socksport 0, so,
SOCKS port is closed. Moreover, I haven't got any exit rule towards port
9050
Even if I block this traffic using iptables, I am very curious about why
the server is
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 04:31 -0400, grarpamp wrote:
Anyone also offering up vpngate, i2p, mail mixes, other
p2p/networks, etc to the public on their relay platform?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 19:10 +0300, Joe wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to run a Tor relay on a spare computer at home. Security is
a concern, and not only regarding the machine running the relay but also
my other computers. Are there any (theoretical or otherwise) known
attacks a person can
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 13:36 +0300, J.C. wrote:
So far I haven't seen any other error messages than something about a
failed DNS server, which always corrects itself half a second or so
afterwards, stating nameservers are back up. It's running on a 100/10
connection, pushing as much upstream
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:35 -0700, Aaron Hopkins wrote:
I sent the following warning to the listed e-mail address of 14 of the 19
Tor nodes I found that accepted connections on port 8118, some of which
bounced.
If any of you run or know how to get in touch with the operators of the
nodes
Ow, forgot to say, don't bother with that hex. From what I could get
with the help of others, this is just a byte reversed/corrupted log
entry. Since the hard drive used to store logs is some years old, I
guess this is related to badblocks.
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:35 -0700, Aaron Hopkins wrote:
12 matches
Mail list logo
