nusenu wrote:
> did I understand it correctly that tor 0.2.8.x did not make it into
> OpenBSD 6.0 because tor 0.2.8.x has been released to recently?
Correct, it's at 0.2.7.6p1.
There are ways of checking this, such as simply looking at a mirror's
package list:
Yawning Angel wrote:
> Michael McConville <mm...@mykolab.com> wrote:
> > I forgot to mention all the crypto required, too. These boards don't
> > have crypto accelerators, so that's a big cost.
>
> What?
I forgot to mention all the crypto required, too. The
Michael McConville wrote:
> Roman Mamedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:40:00 -0600
> > Michael McConville <mm...@mykolab.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > > Has anyone had any experience running *exit* nodes on Raspberry
>
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:40:00 -0600
> Michael McConville <mm...@mykolab.com> wrote:
>
> > Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > Has anyone had any experience running *exit* nodes on Raspberry
> > > Pi-grade hardware, or slightly beefier? We
Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Has anyone had any experience running *exit* nodes on Raspberry
> Pi-grade hardware, or slightly beefier? We are thinking of replacing
> the old, bulky, power-hungry machine currently running exit
> 78C7C299DB4C4BD119A22B87B57D5AF5F3741A79 with something on that level.
> It
Andrew wrote:
> I've got a spare server for two (freebsd) and I'd like to start
> running TOR relays on them.
>
> Is there any security concerns I need to deal with, or is the ports
> compile + updates good enough to keep my systems decently secure.
>
> I actively monitor the machines, but as
harvie josh wrote:
> > Can you add your findings to
> > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs ?
>
> I do not know what their policies on tor relays are, that is why I can
> not really add anything new to that site.
It'a always a good idea to ask.
Dhalgren Tor wrote:
> Bug #18580: exit relay fails with 'unbound' DNS resolver when lots of
> requests time-out
>
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18580
I wouldn't go that far. I've been running with Unbound for ~1.5 years
now (AFAIK) without issue. I've also been told that the
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
> If you're very close to your bandwidth cutoff, why not decrease it
> slightly, and run all the time?
I've always settled on this solution when in that situation. Hibernation
can sometimes work in unexpected ways, get interfered with by unexpected
outages, etc.
elrippo wrote:
> I will also chip in with some funding.
>
> DO you accept Bitcoin or Monero, i do not like to you use PayPal for
> funding an TOR relay ;D
>
> If so, please post the addresses, so we can fund a fast running relay.
Definitely: 1KjWtgsrSRJ6mBMjAuKhqSGvEPVJ8rRoqV
> Also tell
re...@mobtm.com wrote:
> > Sadly, I have to shut it down at least temporarily if no one can help me
> > pay for it. Is anyone interested? You can search the mailing lists to
> > see that I've been contributing for a few years, and I can give more
> > verification if you'd like.
>
> if you're
David Schulz wrote:
> Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
> >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
> >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
> >arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of runn
Michael McConville wrote:
> David Schulz wrote:
> > Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
> > >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
> > >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I
> > >found arm a ne
I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of running my
first relay wore off.
It is fun to use and useful to beginners, though. :-) No disrespect to
Kurt Besig wrote:
> Well. even a doctor would make a few suggestions based on some sort of
> experience based reasoning. Perhaps some connection problems
> associated with running tor-arm on a VPS vs. a home server...things of
> that nature. Also I was just wondering as I don't see many of the
>
Kurt Besig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/2/2015 3:06 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
> > Kurt Besig wrote:
> >> I just set up a VPS on PulseServers as I noticed quite a few
> >> running relays had mostly good things t
Kurt Besig wrote:
> I just set up a VPS on PulseServers as I noticed quite a few running
> relays had mostly good things to say about the service. So Far the
> people operating the servers seem very cooperative and responsive.
> Anyway I've been running a middle relay for 1.5 years and know the
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
