Re: [tor-relays] Question regarding ethical torrent blocking

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > Hello, > > I was going to ask someone off-list, but the amount of abuse and DCMA > complaints I have received now have been so much that I have decided that > the best action to take is to set an exit policy. I run a couple of exit >

Re: [tor-relays] Is Tor-network protected from using one hop?

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Matt Traudt wrote: > On 6/26/18 10:16, dave levi wrote: >> I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the >> source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it >> work's fine(slowly, but still working) and if im sting

Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 25.04.18 14:50, mick wrote: > >> I think I'm immensely lucky to get the service I do. > > Indeed. I guess DigitalOcean's loss will be Hetzner's gain as far as my > business is concerned. See

Re: [tor-relays] So long and thanks for all the abuse complaints

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:39 PM, teor wrote: > Blocking port 80 isn't safe for users: it doubles the number of exits that > they must use, which doubles their risk of a malicious exit. The risk of using port 443 is much lower than the risk of using port 80, because

Re: [tor-relays] my IP got blocked

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Julien ROBIN wrote: > Hi, > > It's not the first time I hear about Non-Exit IP blocked (but may be some > people here are more familiar with the subject) : I don't really know what > are the most used interfaces/websites from which those

Re: [tor-relays] Testing Golang relay implementation

Hey Thanks for doing that! It came many times to my mind. There were efforts on implementing Tor relay in Golang before, by Tom van der Woerdt: https://github.com/tvdw/gotor Have you looked at the project? In his blog post https://tvdw.eu/blog/2015/01/24/implementing-a-tor-relay-from-scratch/

Re: [tor-relays] More recent rpm somewhere?

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 8:22 AM, nusenu wrote: >> I'm running a few relays on CentOS 7 >> As I'm sticking to the ease of rpm distributions, I'm left behind on >> 0.2.9.10 from EPEL >> >> Does anyone know of another rpm repository with a more up to date version ? > > I'm

Re: [tor-relays] blocking >1 connections per ip address onto Tor DirPort

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > I do have the following iptables rule here : > > # Tor > # > dirport=80 > orport=443 > > $IPT -A INPUT -p tcp --destination-port $dirport --match

Re: [tor-relays] keepyourprivcay: Introducing a new 100 mbit/s relay

Thank you for running the relay! On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Keepyourprivacy wrote: > Hello fellow operators of tor relays out there! :) > > I'd like to introduce my new relay, it's called keepyourprivacy and hosted > in the Netherlands, at a provider which is

Re: [tor-relays] Who is running the two biggest Exits in the network?

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Duncan wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Paul: >> >> >> I agree with that part. >> >> But sometimes it helps to look and think things from an extreme point of >> view: >> Let's assume the whole TOR would be anonymous in a way that you cant >> see contacts

Re: [tor-relays] Who is running the two biggest Exits in the network?

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:26 PM, nusenu wrote: >> Since about mid April there are just two similar Exits making up now about >> 4.5% exit probability together. >> Located in Panama, run in the okservers.net network, AS395978 ,they don’t >> give up any further

Re: [tor-relays] Legal Status of Relays Worldwide [was: kittens seized]

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:47 PM, grarpamp wrote: That's actually why the torservers.net people suggest *not* using disk encryption. Having no barriers makes it much easier for the police to realize that there's nothing useful to them. > >>> This falling over may