> 1) What exactly would we pay for?
>
>
Agree on 100+ mbps exit node funding. Also agree with Moritz's suggestion
that there be a form that limits fund disbursement on a per-ISP level, to
encourage ISP diversity (and contribute to the discovery of new "known
good" ISPs for tor).
*Continued* fundi
M, mick wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:03:24 -1000
Name Withheld allegedly wrote:
Most Tor users probably don't read the manual and follow best
practices. I'm sure we've all seen traffic where users are using
google maps to find directions from their home, or logging into the
This is in response to something from Roger's email on funding exit
relays, but I didn't want to derail such an important conversation by
responding directly.
He mentioned:
"At the same time, much of our performance improvement comes
from better load balancing -- that is, concentrati
Hey guys,
My old host shut down my exit node for abuse complaints (forum spam, of
all things...), and I just got up and running again on a new host in
Romania. It's fast and works well (250+ mbps to 1gbps depending on time
of day), the only trouble is I seem to get hardly any traffic passed t
Now that's what I'm talking about. Thanks, fellas!
On 6/18/2012 9:20 AM, Sjon / Spider.007 wrote:
You should take a look at arm: https://www.torproject.org/projects/arm.html.en
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Name Withheld wrote:
I've done some searching, but I can
I've done some searching, but I can't seem to find any references to how
I check the traffic stats (current b/w use, total MB passed, etc) for my
node when running on a linux (CentOS 6) platform. I've built a new vps
with a huge pipe that's command-line-only to maximize performance, but
I'm
Hello,
I just set up an exit node (PrivacyFoundation on the list), and while I've
got 5mbps up, it only advertises as 80-90kb b/w available. That's not at
all accurate, and I think it's meaning the connection is ending up way
underutilized, since I'm not seeing much traffic on the b/w graph.
How
