Hello all,
One of our goals with our current performance work is to reduce the
overload of relays in the network. The implementation of proposal 328[1]
a while back made different overload indicators available to relay
operators and since a couple of weeks ago those can be tracked via
Onionoo[2] a
EA53BA55FCB50
> 23F74D581DE92AC59D3527DE4D448E036139D81E
> A00E900534DFF76371064C03714753EAF8B88820
> C232D8EE677E6BDF5CFFDDCAC4E2B1682DCE7AE5
>
> - The Friendly Exit Node Family
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Thursday, Septem
> done that before). I had first noticed this around 3:45 PM CST on September
> 23.
>
> - The Friendly Exit Node Family
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Friday, September 24th, 2021 at 4:47 AM, Silvia/Hiro
>
;
> On Saturday, September 25, 2021, 7:11:31 AM PDT, Silvia/Hiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I went back in history and tried to find out whenever your node
> FriendlyExit1 was overloaded. I couldn't find the exact descriptor.
>
> One thing I can think of is that on the 2
Ofc I meant you can reply off list.
On 9/27/21 11:16 AM, Silvia/Hiro wrote:
> Gary,
>
> Replying off list.
> Can I know which one is your relay?
> We don't do user-agent detection.
>
> Cheers,
> -hiro
>
> On 9/26/21 4:27 AM, Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
On 9/28/21 8:40 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 9/23/21 3:39 PM, Silvia/Hiro wrote:
>> Let us known how you find this new feature.
> It would be nice if even the search form would have that feature too.
> Currently here all is green:
> https://metrics.torproject.
On 10/4/21 1:36 PM, David Goulet wrote:
> On 02 Oct (01:29:56), torix via tor-relays wrote:
>> My relays (Aramis) marked overloaded don't make any sense either. Two of
>> the ones marked with orange are the two with the lowest traffic I have (2-5
>> MiB/s and 4-9 MiB/s - not pushing any limits
On 21/1/22 12:15, Valters Jansons wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:05 PM Georg Koppen wrote:
>> Yes, we realized that the GeoIP db needs an update again[1]. However
>> there is currently no newer version available[2] it seems. :(
> The issue is not the version of libloc. The problem resides in
On 3/3/22 20:01, awffelwaffels via tor-relays wrote:
I see on every exit node I check on the metrics page, a massive bump
in bandwidth used without a change in exit probability. Is this
perhaps an attacker squeezing the bandwidth of the network so people
are more likely to use their malicious
On 4/3/22 11:40, Eldalië via tor-relays wrote:
Thanks very much. The anomalous peaks disappeared for most of the days
indeed, it remained only for 26/02.
Yes, working to fix the bump for 26/02.
-hiro
Eldalië
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:26:26 +
Georg Koppen wrote:
Eldalië via tor-relays:
Hi all,
I can now confirm the data has been restored and no relay or bridge
should exhibit any bump in traffic due to this but.
Cheers,
-hiro
On 4/3/22 15:11, Silvia/Hiro wrote:
On 4/3/22 11:40, Eldalië via tor-relays wrote:
Thanks very much. The anomalous peaks disappeared for most of
11 matches
Mail list logo