Re: [tor-relays] Odd network activity

Hi all, I can now confirm the data has been restored and no relay or bridge should exhibit any bump in traffic due to this but. Cheers, -hiro On 4/3/22 15:11, Silvia/Hiro wrote: On 4/3/22 11:40, Eldalië via tor-relays wrote: Thanks very much. The anomalous peaks disappeared for most

Re: [tor-relays] Odd network activity

On 4/3/22 11:40, Eldalië via tor-relays wrote: Thanks very much. The anomalous peaks disappeared for most of the days indeed, it remained only for 26/02. Yes, working to fix the bump for 26/02. -hiro Eldalië On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:26:26 + Georg Koppen wrote: Eldalië via

Re: [tor-relays] Odd network activity

On 3/3/22 20:01, awffelwaffels via tor-relays wrote: I see on every exit node I check on the metrics page, a massive bump in bandwidth used without a change in exit probability. Is this perhaps an attacker squeezing the bandwidth of the network so people are more likely to use their

Re: [tor-relays] Outdated GeoIP DB

On 21/1/22 12:15, Valters Jansons wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:05 PM Georg Koppen wrote: >> Yes, we realized that the GeoIP db needs an update again[1]. However >> there is currently no newer version available[2] it seems. :( > The issue is not the version of libloc. The problem resides

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

On 10/4/21 1:36 PM, David Goulet wrote: > On 02 Oct (01:29:56), torix via tor-relays wrote: >> My relays (Aramis) marked overloaded don't make any sense either. Two of >> the ones marked with orange are the two with the lowest traffic I have (2-5 >> MiB/s and 4-9 MiB/s - not pushing any limits

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

On 9/28/21 8:40 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 9/23/21 3:39 PM, Silvia/Hiro wrote: >> Let us known how you find this new feature. > It would be nice if even the search form would have that feature too. > Currently here all is green: > https://metrics.torproject.

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

Ofc I meant you can reply off list. On 9/27/21 11:16 AM, Silvia/Hiro wrote: > Gary, > > Replying off list. > Can I know which one is your relay? > We don't do user-agent detection. > > Cheers, > -hiro > > On 9/26/21 4:27 AM, Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote: >

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

day, September 25, 2021, 7:11:31 AM PDT, Silvia/Hiro > wrote: > > Hi, > I went back in history and tried to find out whenever your node > FriendlyExit1 was overloaded. I couldn't find the exact descriptor. > > One thing I can think of is that on the 22nd when I deployed this

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

t before). I had first noticed this around 3:45 PM CST on September > 23. > > - The Friendly Exit Node Family > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Friday, September 24th, 2021 at 4:47 AM, Silvia/Hiro > wrote: >

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

3F74D581DE92AC59D3527DE4D448E036139D81E > A00E900534DFF76371064C03714753EAF8B88820 > C232D8EE677E6BDF5CFFDDCAC4E2B1682DCE7AE5 > > - The Friendly Exit Node Family > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Thursday, September 23rd, 2021 at 8:

[tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

Hello all, One of our goals with our current performance work is to reduce the overload of relays in the network. The implementation of proposal 328[1] a while back made different overload indicators available to relay operators and since a couple of weeks ago those can be tracked via Onionoo[2]