iate it if someone could fix that.
>
>
> Regards, Paul ___
> tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
- --
Tim Semeijn
Babylon Ne
nge.") response from dirserver '154.35.175.225:80'.
Please correct.
-
I looked through the mailing lists and blog posts to find out if this
range was mentioned somewhere to see why it gets rejected but I could
not find anything.
Can anyone shed some light on why this range woul
case you haven't read this lately (I read it every few
> months and it makes me freshly angry each time), here's your
> pointer to http://paulgraham.com/spamhausblacklist.html
>
> --Roger
>
> ___ tor-relays mailing
> list to
fact that delisting is a pain.
On 5/21/15 10:35 PM, Tim Semeijn wrote:
> The lists of SECTOOR might be used wrongly but they sound like
> they belong to the ever growing list of 'shitty blacklists'. In my
> work for a hosting company I receive complaints regarding
> malpractices of
policy is in place.
On 5/21/15 10:46 PM, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> ++ 21/05/15 22:35 +0200 - Tim Semeijn:
>> The lists of SECTOOR might be used wrongly but they sound like
>> they belong to the ever growing list of 'shitty blacklists'. In
>> my work for
>
> In my per
ists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
> ___ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
-
ot against
> tor philosophy to block access to a specific network to Tor users.
>
> Thanks all in advance for your answers.
>
> Best regards,
>
- --
Tim Semeijn
Babylon Network
pgp 0x5B8A4DDF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
private DNS resolvers for your
nodes? Any feedback/ideas about this?
- --
Tim Semeijn
Babylon Network
pgp 0x5B8A4DDF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVrAzLAAoJEIZioqpbik3fmkcP/R5DXaKoVHUY6SjiSJi0n8ug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I will give running the pdns-recursor locally on the nodes a shot
later the coming week. Probably can squeeze some more throughput out
of it.
Good tips/tweaks!
On 7/19/15 10:52 PM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> Tim Semeijn schreef op 19/07/15 om
ably should also filter entries where two out of guard_prob,
> middle_prob and exit_prob are 0 since that means that (1) is never the
> case - iff onionoo is right about these probabilities.
>
>
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing li
r run master builds after
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/commit/?id=ab9976b7245f05a97e0285265c4cfcb225bd48e2
> https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/tor-nightly-master-stretch
>
> stay safe,
> nusenu
>
--
Tim Semei
It looks like your node is running as guard. This usually drops your traffic
for a while before it builds up again.
On May 18, 2014 8:31:54 PM CEST, Markus Klock wrote:
>This is my
>relay:http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=94f9d8d35c4a4851b1daf85f70f90db95065e81e
>
>regards,
>M
rators take part in this project to
make it resemble the current Tor network better.
- --
Tim Semeijn
pgp 0x08CE9B4D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT55CmAAoJEB4F+FYIzptNpPQIAJ8JpkdkwC+mrxEtYLem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 8/10/14, 6:48 PM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> Tim Semeijn schreef op 10/08/14 17:33:
>> On 8/10/14, 4:32 PM, b...@unseen.is wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> apparently this hasn't been discussed here yet. About a m
_________ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
- --
Tim Semeijn
pgp 0x08CE9B4D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT8pDNAAoJEB4F+FYIzptNWk
eciate if you could help me or at least give me some
> tips with finding the best country and provider.
>
> Thanks. :)
>
>
>
> ___ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bi
16 matches
Mail list logo
