Asked this before, but no one answered, so I'll try adding on this thread.
What are the Tor signing keys? What key is being used here:
https://dist.torproject.org/tor-0.4.7.13.tar.gz.sha256sum.asc
On Mon, January 23, 2023 3:59 pm, Georg Koppen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In case it affects you as you
> This proposal seems to come from a
> desire of power and control over the network, not
> actually improving "anonymity" for users
That sounds more like a personal reaction to not wanting to be identified
rather than a helpful statement about other people's motivations, which
I'd stay away from,
> On 9/28/20 1:54 PM, Matt Corallo wrote:
>
>> Different folks have different views on abuse reports, and that's
>> perfectly OK. But "taking it up with list XYZ" isn't
>> going to change that (see discussion on NANOG a few months ago on this
>> very topic =D) - people are always going to have
>>
On Mon, September 28, 2020 5:04 pm, Matt Corallo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I run a few relatively-small exit nodes, and still get a decent flow of
> the usual Fail2Ban, blocklist.de, and such
> garbage to abuse PoCs. I tend to proactively find appropriate abuse/noc
> contacts to provide a response in
On Thu, September 10, 2020 2:52 pm, kirg...@riseup.net wrote:
> hi, generalized question about Tor exit relays and exit relay operators.
> do some exit relay operators have a policy to prevent connections
> leaving their exit node via non-encrypted ports (e.g. port 25)?
Although the intent of y
On Mon, January 8, 2018 11:25 am, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2018-01-08 03:21, Florentin Rochet wrote:
>>> Perhaps in the case that the HS operator is not trying to mask the HS
>>> location, the act of mixing public relay traffic can be nothing but a
>>> *help* to defeat anyone trying to correlate t
On Mon, January 8, 2018 2:21 am, Florentin Rochet wrote:
> Hey Tortilla,
>
> Sorry for the late reply:
>
> On 2018-01-05 21:13, Tortilla wrote:
>>> The issue is fixed by adding the above warning message: if you care
>>> about your hidden service's "hidd
On Fri, January 5, 2018 12:31 pm, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 03:08:48AM -, torti...@mantablue.com wrote:
>> Second, I had read in the past opinions stating:
>>
>> When operating a hidden service, running a relay helps mix traffic so
>> that
>> anyone observing traffic f
>> When operating a hidden service and a relay in one tor instance, tor
>> currently warns:
>>
>> [warn] Tor is currently configured as a relay and a hidden service.
>> That's
>> not very secure: you should probably run your hidden service in a
>> separate
>> Tor process, at least -- see https://tr
When operating a hidden service and a relay in one tor instance, tor
currently warns:
[warn] Tor is currently configured as a relay and a hidden service. That's
not very secure: you should probably run your hidden service in a separate
Tor process, at least -- see https://trac.torproject.org/8742
10 matches
Mail list logo
