Re: [tor-relays] Multi-core Support

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I have to agree with that, multicore support is really important and should be on the top of the priority list. Thomas White: > Have there been any updated ETAs concerning the development/support > of multi-core for the core tor workloads? If not, i

Re: [tor-relays] pinning relay keys to IPs (or not)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 teor: > >> On 27 Jul 2015, at 01:30 , starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: >> >> Perhaps a way to do it is reset the consensus for a relay if its >> IP address moves to a different Autonomous System. >> >> Is rare that dynamic IP causes relays to h

[tor-relays] Abuse messages from IPs marked as rejected in the exit policy

Hi all, I am receiving abuse messages for the Torland1 relay for IPs that are blacklisted in the exit policy. For example as https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E1E922A20AF608728824A620BADC6EFC8CB8C2B8 shows, 62.67.194.0/24 is blocked. But I am getting abuse messages out of this IP range. C

[tor-relays] [WARN]Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc/TUNING for guidance

Hi all, since I upgraded the torland relay from 2.6.7 to 0.2.7.6 I get the following warnings: 09:20:30 [WARN] Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc/TUNING for guidance. [101144347 similar message(s) suppressed in last 21600 seconds] Google only spits out https://t

Re: [tor-relays] [WARN]Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc/TUNING for guidance

On Sunday 21 February 2016 11:56:37 Jonas Bergler wrote: > https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/doc/TUNING Thanks Jonas for the link. file descriptors should be set to ulimit -n 65535 in the tor startup script. I thought that would work. But checking /proc/PID/limits I saw that file descri

Re: [tor-relays] [WARN]Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc/TUNING for guidance

On Sunday 21 February 2016 12:57:52 Julien ROBIN wrote: > When I had 2 tor clients running (the second launched manually by a user > named "tor2"), I modified the "limits.conf" file, adding those 2 lines at > the end : > > #* softcore0 > #roothardcore

Re: [tor-relays] [WARN]Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc/TUNING for guidance

On Sunday 21 February 2016 12:02:49 nusenu wrote: > > since I upgraded the torland relay from 2.6.7 to 0.2.7.6 I get the > > following warnings: > > > > 09:20:30 [WARN] Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please > > read doc/TUNING for guidance. [101144347 similar message(s) suppress

Re: [tor-relays] interesting network sockets pattern

On Friday 26 August 2016 14:37:48 Toralf Förster wrote: > On 08/25/2016 07:02 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > > This is a fresh new Tor exit, setup 4 days ago, > > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/BE2FA9FCB6242567B93ED99FEC5543FC517 > > C9276 , where I do wonder how to interpret the attached scree

Re: [tor-relays] How to include files into torrc?

On Friday 09 September 2016 20:22:47 Ralph Seichter wrote: > # /etc/tor/torrc > ORPort 443 > # Policies are kept in separate file for readability > Include /etc/tor/policies > There is a ticket that handles this feature: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1922 Regards, torl

Re: [tor-relays] Research project - comparing abuse complaints on Tor exits to those of regular ISPs

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:20:06PM +0200, Volker Mink wrote: >Mine is running for close to two years now and i got 2 regular complaints >with specific accusation (torrent...) from known german lawyers. >And one really common from my ISP - "we detected illegal activities. >please per

Re: [tor-relays] DoS from my tor guard VPS

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:41:09PM -0800, Arisbe wrote: > One of my tor guard relays is a medium size VPS operating in the Czech > Republic. It's been up and stable for several years. Several weeks ago I > was notified that my VPS was a source of UDP DoS traffic. It was shut down. > Logs showed

[tor-relays] Shutdown of TorLand1

Hi all, after 5 years of operation I will shutdown TorLand1 (https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E1E922A20AF608728824A620BADC6EFC8CB8C2B8) on February 17 2017. During the time of operation it pumped almost 6 PetaByte of exit traffic. Compared to the amount of traffic, the number of complai

Re: [tor-relays] Configuring a Tor relay to *not* accept torrent traffic

Red Rover wrote on 17.05.2012: > Hi there, :-) > > I am running a Tor relay on a VPS. > > How do I configure it to NOT accept torrent traffic? > > I have just received an abuse report from my hosting company. > > All the best, > > Redrover > Hi, using a small python script I retrieved the

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

mick wrote on 22.05.2012: > I assume you mean "IP address" rather than "port" here. > > Despite offering, I wasn't given the opportunity to do that. > > Interesting that you also seem to have been used in targetting the > brazilian government. > I can confirm abuse messages for same target, s

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

Michael Millspaugh wrote on 22.05.2012: > Can you be more specific with your resolution for this issue? > I've received a second abuse report in a week for the same issue - SQL > scanning - and I'll have to shut down my node unless I can somehow block > this activity. I have source and destination

[tor-relays] ARM 1.4.5 has a very high cpu consumption

Hi, today I updated arm from 1.4.4.1 to 1.4.5. After this update I noticed that the arm display is very unresponsive. The arm cpu jumps ever couple of seconds up to 90-100 %. If this happens arm does not update its display. This can be observed on all pages. I monitor two high capacity nodes wi

Re: [tor-relays] ARM 1.4.5 has a very high cpu consumption

On, 9. Juni 2012, 12:32:21 Damian Johnson wrote: > Hi Klaus. Nope, this isn't a known issue and it kinda surprises me > since 1.4.5 was mostly just a bunch of bugfixes (there aren't any new > features that should account for this). Would you mind running with > the '--debug' flag? This will output

Re: [tor-relays] How to Run Torservers.net

Am Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2012, 14:33:55 schrieb Moritz Bartl: > 6) Be quick in answering abuse. > We receive a very small number of complaints, given that we run high > bandwith nodes. I am actually still surprised how few complaints we get. > Roughly 80% are automated reports, which we ignore, and fo

Re: [tor-relays] How to Run Torservers.net

On Juli 12, 2012, at 01:24 PM Julian Wissmann wrote: > Short answer: ~110 of which we ignore 105 > Long answer: > About 15 automated abuses from MediaSentry, Icecat, IP-Echelon and the > likes per day, which we used to automatically answer, but don't bother > about, any more. [...] Thanks for your

Re: [tor-relays] Help the Tor Project by running a fast unpublished bridge

ON Saturday, August 11. 2012, 18:25:03 Roger Dingledine wrote: > The constraints are: > * 100mbit+ connectivity, though in practice I expect they will spend > most of their time doing far less than that. > * No more than 2 bridges per /24. If you're running fast (100mbit+) > exits (which is more im

Re: [tor-relays] Help the Tor Project by running a fast unpublished bridge

On Monday, August 13. 2012, 00:55:45 Roger Dingledine wrote: > This discussion really goes back to a simple question: is it better to > use our funding for more design and development, or for strengthening > the network? For exit relays, I think choosing "strengthen the network" > is a great and wo

[tor-relays] Using aes-in in Tor

Hi, I am struggling setting up aes-in support with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I enabled aes in bios. cat /proc/cpuinfo shows the aes flag. #lsmod |grep aes aesni_intel55664 0 cryptd 20530 1 aesni_intel aes_x86_64 17208 1 aesni_intel shows that the module is lo

Re: [tor-relays] Using aes-in in Tor

On Wednesday, August 15. 2012, 10:43:05 Robert Ransom wrote: > > #openssl version > > OpenSSL 1.0.1 14 Mar 2012 > > OpenSSL 1.0.1 uses AES-NI by default if it is available. > Does this mean that the command #openssl engine (rsax) RSAX engine support (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support does

Re: [tor-relays] Using aes-in in Tor

On Wednesday, August 15. 2012, 14:33:34 Moritz Bartl wrote: > Yes, that is correct. That is what " OpenSSL 1.0.1 does not come with an > extra module and should directly support AES-NI. " in the wiki was meant > to say. I will revise the section a bit. Thanks for clarification. I already supposed

[tor-relays] Massive ongoing google groups spamming

Hi all, there is a massive spamming of google groups ongoing. I received several complains as below. From the domain list it seems that all major Tor exit nodes are affected. Running an Exit without custom WHOIS, all abuse message are received by my ISP and forwarded. So I have to temporarily

[tor-relays] Need help: High capacity exit relay does not get traffic

Hi, I am operating two 1 GBit/s servers which host 7 exit nodes. One server is located in GB with torland1 https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/4E377F91D326552AAE818D5A17BC3EF79639C2CD torland2 https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/332895D092C2524A3CDE8F6E1498FFE665EBFC34 torland1 is configur

[tor-relays] How to get client locale statistics without arm?

Hi, I would like to know from which countries my nodes are mostly used. I tried to use arm for this but on high capacity relays arm eats the same cpu resources as the tor process it monitors, if the connection panel is activated. Switching to the connection panel lets arm often freeze. Is there

Re: [tor-relays] How to get client locale statistics without arm?

On Wednesday, 28. November 2012, 14:47:05 Damian Johnson wrote: > Have you tried tweaking the query rate options in your armrc? > > https://gitweb.torproject.org/arm.git/blob/HEAD:/armrc.sample No I have not yet tried this. > > > Switching to the connection panel lets arm often freeze. Is the

Re: [tor-relays] Suggestions for Tor Relay Operators after a Police interaction

On Friday, 30. November 2012, 09:14:34 Andrew Lewman wrote: > 2. Find legal representation. A list of possible legal advisers can be > found here, > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/start-tor-legal-support-directory. If > none of these people are in your country, or close to you, ask either > the E

[tor-relays] Traffic pattern on Tor relay

Hi, I am monitoring the network interface of my tor server with nload. From time to time nload shows strange traffic patterns: http://i.imgur.com/0Wr9h.png The graph is updated every second so one hash mark corresponds to one second. The most recent traffic value is on the right side. The graph

[tor-relays] Registration of a Tor node at the German Bundesnetzagentur

Hi, this is a question more specific for the German jurisdiction. At the 29C3 in Hamburg I attended a interesting talk about open WIFI (http://is.gd/9G8AVA unfortunately in German) who was given by Reto Mantz (http://www.offenenetze.de/). He gave the advice to register open WIFIs which are op

Re: [tor-relays] Registration of a Tor node at the German Bundesnetzagentur

On Wednesday 02 January 2013 14:56:59 Moritz Bartl wrote: > There is a fundamental legal difference between operating Internet > Access Providers and Internet Service Providers. As a Tor exit, you > should and want to be judged as a service provider. The key difference > is that Access Providers gi

Re: [tor-relays] Registration of a Tor node at the German Bundesnetzagentur

On Wednesday 02 January 2013 13:34:27 Fabian Keil wrote: > While I was living in Overath I "registered" my relays with the > Police in Rösrath (who always acted very professionally and respectful). Good point. I never thought about pro actively informing the local police about my nodes. Will check

Re: [tor-relays] Registration of a Tor node at the German Bundesnetzagentur

On Sunday 06 January 2013 20:35:25 Markus Drenger wrote: > the guys from opentracker told us at 24c3 that they have made good > experiences with informing their upstream provider about their > activities. that way their provider forwarded all abuse-mails directly > to them. > > events.ccc.de/congr

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean, cheap VPS that's ok with middle relays

On Tuesday 08 January 2013 20:51:52 Moritz Bartl wrote: > Thanks for the hint. In general, I don't see why VPS providers would not > allow internal Tor relaying, and I would not even bother to ask first. > Interesting values to know about VPS providers are bandwidth allowance > ("unlimited" is quit

Re: [tor-relays] A bit more evidence on circuit creation storms

You could modify the tor init script to limit the memory usable by /usr/sbin/tor as described here: http://jlebar.com/2011/6/15/Limiting_the_amount_of_RAM_a_program_can_use.html But I don’t know if this works on RaspPi platform and what happens when the tor process hits the memory limit. Regar

Re: [tor-relays] Upgrade your relay to 0.2.4.17-rc?

Updated torland family. Hope that the new version helps. One of the last messages before update to 0.2.4.17-rc: Sep 05 21:06:29.000 [warn] Your computer is too slow to handle this many circuit creation requests! Please consider using the MaxAdvertisedBandwidth config option or choosing a more r

Re: [tor-relays] Upgrade your relay to 0.2.4.17-rc?

On Thursday 05 September 2013 22:27:53 tor-admin wrote: > Updated torland family. Hope that the new version helps. One of the last > messages before update to 0.2.4.17-rc: > > Sep 05 21:06:29.000 [warn] Your computer is too slow to handle this many > circuit creation requests!

[tor-relays] What happens with the time on turtles 76.73.17.194?

Hi Mike, I am seeing many of these messages in the logs of torland1/torland2: Sep 21 12:09:34.000 [warn] Received NETINFO cell with skewed time from server at 76.73.17.194:9090. It seems that our clock is ahead by 15969 days, 10 hours, 9 minutes, or that theirs is behind. Tor requires an accur

Re: [tor-relays] What happens with the time on turtles 76.73.17.194?

Thanks. Sorry for the noise. Should have checked trac first. On Saturday 21 September 2013 06:21:50 Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:19:42PM +0200, tor-admin wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > > I am seeing many of these messages in the logs of torland1/torland2:

Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report

On Thursday 31 October 2013 19:14:47 Andy Isaacson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:52:41PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 06:12:47PM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > > That's correct, it takes a deliberate action on the part of the > > > administrator to become a rela

Re: [tor-relays] Torservers awarded $250,000 by Digital Defenders

On Saturday 14 December 2013 13:28:52 Christian wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hej! > > Torservers.net has been awarded $250,000 over two years by the Digital > Defenders Partnership to strengthen and improve the Tor network, the > anonymity system crucial to journal

Re: [tor-relays] Scoreboard enhancements / Trying Trusted Tor Traceroutes

On Sunday 26 January 2014 12:48:34 Sebastian Urbach wrote: > But here the good news. The live scoreboard was modified. There is now a > new column which shows the number of completed runs per IP and also at the > bottom a value which displays the total sum of systems who completed at I am wonderin

Re: [tor-relays] Scoreboard enhancements / Trying Trusted Tor Traceroutes

On Sunday 26 January 2014 16:27:12 renke brausse wrote: > The needed time (even for the default of scamper with 1000 pps) is imho > a rather good explanation to torland's question why only 68 of nearly > 300 participating IPs finished the whole measurement at least once. I launched the script from

Re: [tor-relays] using Arm to manage nodes

On Friday 07 February 2014 18:24:20 ja...@icetor.is wrote: > Hello all, > This is something that's bothered me for quite some time. I often use > arm (https://www.torproject.org/projects/arm.html.en) for monitoring my > relays and to keep a quick eye on things like overall bandwidth > consumed, tra

Re: [tor-relays] Trying Trusted Tor Traceroutes

On Friday 07 February 2014 22:05:41 Sebastian Urbach wrote: > Dear list members, > > The Trying Trusted Tor Traceroutes project is coming closer to the next > data review (03/2014). > > Basically every relay (except Bridges) can help to evaluate the Tor Routes. > Please consider that one complete

Re: [tor-relays] using Arm to manage nodes

On Friday 07 February 2014 20:43:10 ja...@icetor.is wrote: > Additionally does anyone know what effects the client locale statistics > on page 2? I've had those statistics come and go and I can't figure out > what causes them to disappear. Your relay needs have have the Guard flag in order to see t

Re: [tor-relays] TTTT, multiple runs

Hi, It seems to me that on http://datarepo.cs.illinois.edu/relay_scoreboard.html you list under "Mesureing IPs" the IP from where the data was uploaded via ssh, but that must not be the correct IP if the script was run with option -c 'trace -S SRCADD' Regards, torland On Wednesday 19 Februa

Re: [tor-relays] How long from enabling ExitPolicy's to getting the Exit flag?

Once you allow exiting traffic you get immediately the flag. There is no delay as far as I know, apart from the time it takes for the authorities voting process. Regards Torland On Wednesday 26 February 2014 14:26:17 David Serrano wrote: > Hi, > > I finally decided to accept some ports in my

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Performance

There a couple of sysctrl parameters that Moritz described here: https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server#sysctlconf Without setting them my relays were not able to handle really large numbers of concurrent connections. Regards, torland On Monday 24 March 2014 20:02:15 Sebastian Urbach w

Re: [tor-relays] "as well as block BitTorrent after repeated offenses..."

Hi, I'll happily block BitTorrent it before any offenses start. Just tell me how. Regards, =-John-= Spencer Neitzke spake thusly: as well as block BitTorrent after repeated offenses -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ __

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Nodes under DDoS attacks

Since I started operating the Torland1/Torland2 nodes in 2011 I noticed less than 20 DDOS attacks that lasted usually only a couple of minutes. I was never contacted by my provider. regards, torland On Monday 04 August 2014 14:53:12 Tyler Durden wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Ha

[tor-relays] [warn] No unused circIDs found on channel without wide circID support

Hi, since upgrading torland to 0.2.5.8-rc I see the below warnings. Is this something to worry about? Regards, torland -- Sep 28 16:07:24.000 [warn] No unused circIDs found on channel without wide circID support, with 0 i

Re: [tor-relays] doc/HARDENING Draft

On Monday 24 November 2014 18:09:34 Libertas wrote: > Here's the relevant ticket: > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13703 > > A specific topic of conversation is how much of the advice should be > in the document itself as opposed to linked sources. > > It could also use more O

Re: [tor-relays] Possible DDoS

On Friday 26 December 2014 15:48:20 Christian Burkert wrote: > Furthermore, I wondered if the attackers were attracted to my system > because of the Tor service, or were just randomly picking targets. > But from your previous descriptions, I rather deduce that it is more > like the latter, rather r

Re: [tor-relays] how to monitor traffick through a bridge

On Monday 05 January 2015 17:40:09 mattia wrote: > Hi, I would like to know how one can monitor traffic that goes > through a bridge. I have set one up and would like to know whether it > is being used or not, and how much. Thanks! You might try arm: https://www.atagar.com/arm/ A nice ncurses bas

Re: [tor-relays] Changes in network traffic pattern

On Friday 06 February 2015 11:32:42 Hu Man wrote: > First thought was DDOS but traffic is not high enough to cause any problems. > I did some digging and in a 5 minute period received the following requests > to the port tor is listening on (number of requests and source ip address) > [... removed

[tor-relays] FYI: Subpoena Received

FYI, I received a subpoena from a US based court to produce information about individual(s) who were using one of our exit nodes at a specific date/time. In the nearly 3 months that these exits have been in operation, this is the first subpoena and only the second complaint received. For purpo

Re: [tor-relays] FYI: Subpoena Received

Yes, the relays are US-based. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 23:10, I wrote: > Are and or the relay in USA? > >> FYI, I received a subpoena from a US based court to produce information >> about individual(s) who were using one of our exit nodes at a specific >> date/time. In the nearly 3 months that

Re: [tor-relays] FYI: Subpoena Received

comfortable > sharing. I am not able to provide legal advice, but if this looks like a > situation where legal advice will be required, I have some contacts who may > be able to provide assistance. Thank you for running exit relays. > On Jun 8, > 2018, at 5:43 AM, Matt Traudt wrote:

Re: [tor-relays] FYI: Subpoena Received

d Tor-savvy ISP (Hurricane Electric) was a big plus. * Having an attorney designated who is familiar with Tor /in advance/ would have saved time. Your mileage may vary. On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 08:42, Vasilis wrote: > Hi IPfail, > > "IPfail (Tor Admin)": > >> T

Re: [tor-relays] Middleman/guard nodes raided in the Netherlands

On 10.11.2011 11:48, David wrote: > I just wanted to let everyone know that my two Tor nodes have been > raided (+all my computer equipment and everything that could store data). > > I'm not sure what triggered all this unwanted attention, but I suspect > that it's the local police department tryi

[tor-relays] Need help with Dir Address and Exit Address

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all I have an exit relay running, and all is working well. I am a stickler though, and i notice when i search my relay on the metrics page, the following two items are listed as 'none': Dir Address  Exit Address Can anyone help me to get thes

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

My relay was showing as overloaded and I couldn’t figure out why, system utilization was extremely low, only using a tiny bit of ram, network throughout was problem free, I was scratching my head until I realized it shows for 72 hours, and I had been doing a heavy distcc compile on my server on

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Agreed, can the thresholds be published publicly for easy reference? Sometimes i get the overloaded flag but i have nothing in my logs, and my cpu/memory is abundant.  It would be much easier to ascertain the cause of this if we knew what we were

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I am having a lot of trouble figuring out why my relay keeps showing as overloaded on the search page. I believe I have more than enough memory and cpu power to not be overloaded on hardware. My server internet connection is 10GB up/down unmetered

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

and report overloaded states, but I only know so much about Tor.Hope this helps.Respectfully,Gary On Tuesday, September 28, 2021, 10:28:42 AM PDT, Bleedangel Tor Admin wrote:

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

Agreed . My relay is wellBelow all of the thresholds for “overloaded”, for gods sake 64gb ram and 12 cpus should be adequate for a tor relay? 10gb connection?I’ve asked multiple times for help trying to figure this out and have gotten zero response. It seems to be very difficult to get any help

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 This is much more informational. Great job! As someone with mystery "overloaded" problems, i'd recommend / request / beg for the following: 1) When the relay is overloaded, a yellow indicator appears on the web page. This indicator remains for 72

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

Can you link to where I can edit the torproject.org documentation? I cannot find this feature.Thanks Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 06:48, wrote: On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 8:55:01 PM CEST potlatch via tor-relays wrote:> Tor has always been very

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge showing offline

You are running 0.4.5.8, maybe updating to a newer version of tor will help?Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:02, Georg Koppen wrote: Eddie:> Looking at tor metrics, one of my bridges is showing as off-line:> B080140DC1BAB5B86D1CE5A4CA2EF64F20282440>>

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

Did you use a lot of ram or cpu power recently? I got flagged as overloaded when I was compiling something and used a lot of cpu.Again, the problem here is that even if you fix it, you won’t know for 3 days. Therefore if you try multiple methods to fix it you won’t know what the problem is.I who

Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search

The problem is that it’s *not* currently overloaded, there’s nothing to see. Maybe you can check your syslogs for anything out of the ordinary system-wide? Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:09, Arlen Yaroslav via tor-relays wrote: > I am n

Re: [tor-relays] Crashed Relay

If you upgraded tor as a package on your Linux OS recently, it may have overwritten your torrc with defaults? It’s a long shot!Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 12:52, sysmanager7 via tor-relays wrote: I was notified by Uptime Robot that relay

Re: [tor-relays] Newbie needs help

Tor project recommends 16Mbits/s in each direction minimum so you should be fine. However note the concurrent connections requirement, which can "overwhelm consumer-level routers."   That might be something to watch. On 3/22/22 0

Re: [tor-relays] Debian is not allowing tor to update despite it being listed as a trusted respritory

Your sources.list file entry looks incorrect.  I would definitely not recommend using trust=yes for a repo like tor, as it bypasses apt's security checks. According to the instructions you linked , your source for the tor packages should be li

Re: [tor-relays] Comcast blocks ALL traffic with tor relays

If we could get EFF to announce a boycott of any corporation known to act maliciously against Tor or other privacy-friendly technology (such as VPNs), that would go a long way. I will also write to EFF.  I have donated money to them, so maybe they will listen.  If they won't support a boycott