has been running fine for months without this memory problem. My Raspberry
Pi relay with 4 GB of RAM relay does not seem to have this problem.
> Op 15-01-2024 11:14 CET schreef torserver :
>
>
> Starting about a week or so the number of connections raised rapidly to
> 18000+ an
Starting about a week or so the number of connections raised rapidly to 18000+
and since then my middle relay reboots every 15 minutes. Lowering the
relaybandwidth to a few MBytes partly solved these reboots. Before these
unplanned reboots the relay has run for months at 20 - 40 MBytes traffic
Gus,
thanks for the advices on both subjects, and the links to the recipes for both
the RPI install including TOR updates, and the Snowflake proxy. I 'll try the
Snowflake first.
Regards, torserver.
> Op 08-08-2023 22:39 CEST schreef gus :
>
>
> >Why is there n
Roger,
I had the same problem with 3 financial websites blocking my IP address while
running a middle relay. Exactly 5 days after stopping the relay these sites can
be reached again. They probably use the same mechanism, visible in the TPRB
Firefox plug-in.
I run my home relay on a low energy
Hi,
on my Raspberry Pi 4 I can 't update from 0.4.5. The armhf architecture seems
to be the problem. How do I have to upgrade to the newer versions?
So far I haven 't found the ultimate way to setup a TOR relay on a Raspi 4 with
auto updates.
Greetz ghostbuster
> Op 02-08-2022 14:00 schreef to
Hello list members,
for simple - political - reasons, i began contributing otherwise wasted
bandwith to the tor network about half a year ago. And i am reading this
list.
Lately, there has been a discussion (Intrusion Prevention System
Software - Snort or Suricata), that brought up some opinions
Last week, i had been erroneously assuming, the daily reassigned
external IP addresses from my provider would kill Tor, as someone
suggested in the IRC. So i ran a quick "sudo update-rc.d tor disable".
Only later, when i learned, the IP change doesnt cause too much trouble,
i reenabled Tor. Since
Hello,
slowly getting acquainted with running a Tor relay, i am wondering:
>From my gathering, tor is - at times - connecting to many instances of
akamai CDN services, amazonaws, and other similar services
simultaneously. When i say many instances, i mean: a saw a peak exposure
of 30 outgoing po
Hello,
i have been running a new relay for a short time period now and would
like to bring to your attention the issues faced, that finally led me to
refrain from keeping this up any longer:
* Documentation was ok (on torproject.org) and the installation (using
deb on ubuntu) was easy.
*
That will be a problem because that instances will get several
IPv6-addresses during the day because of active privacy extensions and the
router get a new /56 for IPv6 from the ISP every day. A manual change of
the torrc is inefficient for me. Because of that I will deactivate
IPv6-support at the a
thanks, now I got a similar information:
> 13:36:02 [WARN] Unable to use configured IPv6 address "[::]" in a
> descriptor. Skipping it. Try specifying a globally reachable address
> explicitly.
what do you think?
Marcel
> JovianMallard hat am 13. Mai 2015 um 15:27 geschrieben:
>
>
> [::1] is
I have enabled it at 1 VPS and 1 Root.
And I enabled it on 2 instances which are connected via
broadbandconnections with dynamic addresses for IPv4 and IPv6. There I got
that information after applying the configuration:
> 07:05:49 [WARN] Unable to use configured IPv6 address "[::1]" in a
> descr
12 matches
Mail list logo
