Re: [tor-relays] Bridge not used

2022-05-11 Thread yl
ns all the time, so it is used. yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge not used

2022-05-10 Thread yl
ution/ I think this line can be removed from your torrc "BridgeDistribution any", I guess then it defaults to something, I assume to https. Is that correct? Regards yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.to

Re: [tor-relays] comments, hints and tipps for an ansible role to deploy Tor bridges

2022-05-04 Thread yl
I am just a beginner to Absible, so I will not be of any help there, but there is also some playbooks and roles for bridges here: https://github.com/alxndr42/ Regards yl On 4/20/22 19:54, Toralf Förster wrote: I do appreciate those for my attempt here: https://github.com/toralf/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Exit: Complaints of IP being used for "spam" despite exit policy

2022-05-04 Thread yl
On 5/4/22 14:31, li...@for-privacy.net wrote: It's actually very unlikely that a longer running exit can send mails.;-) I can't even send myself log mails from my exit IP's because all IP's are blacklisted. On abusix.com and similar. I wonder if you could use msmtp to replace sendmail and

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Exit: Complaints of IP being used for "spam" despite exit policy

2022-05-04 Thread yl
Hello Neel, I found in the past year, that these Spam abuse complaints are about Spam sent via some webmailer, so someone uses port 80/443 and then sent spam via a email providers website. Very strange they even report this as spam. Regards yl On 5/3/22 20:42, Neel Chauhan wrote: Hi

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-21 Thread yl
On 2/19/22 00:06, nusenu wrote: You can run a relay that does allow exiting to IPv6 and not IPv4 but it will not get the exit flag. Which means what? Will it be use for exit at all? Would be sad to loose this 300MBit/s fully used Exit. yl

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-21 Thread yl
that in the standard doc. online. I will try what happens if I apply a config with IPv6 exit only, I guess it could work now. At least I need to close 80/443, as that seems to be the source for spam, I assume it is some webform or forum spam that got the server listed in the spam block list. yl

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-21 Thread yl
not happy with it, but it's better than being discredited by ISPs. E-Mail is banned, I think the reason for my problems was forum spam, so some spam done via 80/443. yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.o

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-18 Thread yl
don't want to allow (reject) all exit to IPv4 and guess that muss be possible somehow? Regards yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Reduced exit and not IPv4 exit traffic at all

2022-02-17 Thread yl
many IPv6 resources that a IPv6 only Exit should still be fine. Thanks yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor not starting but log inconclusive

2021-12-14 Thread yl
outStartSec=300" that should work well. I am sure there is nicer solutions, but why bother. yours yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor not starting but log inconclusive

2021-12-14 Thread yl
. Thanks, will check further. yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Tor not starting but log inconclusive

2021-12-14 Thread yl
ave this issue for some weeks, maybe since the late summer. I do not restart the Exit that often, so just 3 restarts due to some updates of Debian. Any idea how to troubleshoot this and what to look for? Thanks yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-rela

Re: [tor-relays] Fw: Exit stops after one year, then again after few days

2020-05-13 Thread yl
tivity fails, it is just a PING6, but it'll do the job. Then when this happens I will check my system logs. Regards yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Exit stops after one year, then again after few days

2020-04-30 Thread yl
is still in the error state. I am very thankful for help. Regards yl On 08/04/2020 10:53, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 09:40:39AM +0200, ylms wrote: >> So I see some info there, but nothing helpful since I just activated >> logging yesterday. I will revisit this in

Re: [tor-relays] Debian-tor Vs User

2020-04-26 Thread yl
the time for several Exits. Regards yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Advices about Tor Network in general...

2020-01-09 Thread yl
d say something with a bit more power should be able to take 12MByte/s. Regards yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] %include in torrc

2020-01-07 Thread yl
Hello Toralf Depending on the OS it is called arm or nyx. I can check the log output of tor itself, I think that is the source of the nyx messages in the initial screen. Regards yl Am 7. Januar 2020 19:12:46 MEZ schrieb "Toralf Förster" : >On 1/7/20 6:36 PM, ylms wrote: >&

Re: [tor-relays] Combined relay and hidden service, good idea or not?

2018-01-09 Thread yl
relay, what is the downside there? Just wondering if for that usecase, SSH to login remotely on to the relay would still have any disadvantages that I missed to consider. Thanks. yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.to

Re: [tor-relays] #34C3 Tor Assembly

2017-12-17 Thread yl
people that would be able to run a Tor relay on their idle home server or on some raspberry pi, so it might be a good way to reach new people. Regards yl On 13.12.2017 22:46, Artikel 5 e.V. wrote: > Hello, > when I looked around in the wiki for this years Chaos Communication >

Re: [tor-relays] companies and organizations running relays

2017-12-07 Thread yl
re reading the list as well but only as a digest, so replys look odd. They are happy to give guidance, also if people do not have the money to run relays/exits they are happy about admins supporting them by donating some time. They are also on Twitter https://twitter.com/artikel5ev Thanks yl Am

Re: [tor-relays] How to exclude a CDN ?

2016-08-13 Thread yl
ust be another exit node. That is the short version, I always provide the same explanation. yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] How to exclude a CDN ?

2016-08-13 Thread yl
Am 09.08.2016 um 18:32 schrieb Green Dream: > So yeah... I think you're out of luck. Let them block your exit, if they are consequent and block all tor they get what they want. I guess. yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.

Re: [tor-relays] List Problem

2016-04-17 Thread yl
Am 17.04.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Vasilis: > Check your mailing list subscription here: > (https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays) > > > Hope this helps! Probably not, if the person does not receive the email. ;-) BR yl

[tor-relays] webiron requesting to block several /24 subnet

2015-10-20 Thread yl
for the Tor network? Let me know your thoughts. The services URL is https://www.webiron.com, don't need to go there, I didn't because such services are just useless. Better use fail2ban or something similar. Greeting yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Preventing wp-admin related abuse report

2015-09-15 Thread yl
ere access to the Internet is restricted. For more information please see https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html#overview //End However, the main thing I wanted to pass on is that standard text I use, feel free, copy and use it. greetings yl Am 15.09.2015 um 21:42 schrieb spiros_spi...@f

Re: [tor-relays] Exit relay is apparently being used to attack other servers

2015-06-15 Thread yl
be good to block these ports if reasonable. Also contacting the complaining party might be a good idea in some cases. greetings yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] a line enable IPv6 on your relay

2015-05-24 Thread yl
into torbrowser to enable/disable ipv6? Not sure where the a should be put, so maybe someone can just past a sample config with the IPv6 enabled, I think from that we can substitute easily. One question also, is this for relay servers or ONLY for exit enabled servers? yl

Re: [tor-relays] running multiple bridges on one machine?

2015-04-28 Thread yl
, the bottleneck is the missing AES-NI I think, however on 100MBit/s it only makes 35MBit/s with one CPU core being loaded 100% and the other 3 at ~10%. My relay makes a few TB/month like that, so I guess it is still good to keep it running. Greetings yl

Re: [tor-relays] MY IP adress on blacklist and then in exit relay policy

2015-03-30 Thread yl
want to check with your hoster to ignore some of them, they usually understand what tor is and also understand that complaints are not caused by you. yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[tor-relays] Hardware specs for Tor Relay

2015-03-26 Thread yl
being one part of the bottleneck? Thanks yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Public Tor Socks port

2015-03-25 Thread yl
Am 24.03.2015 um 23:16 schrieb Josef Stautner: you can do it if you want. But the traffic between you and the server is unencrypted. I think that's the main reason. Thanks for the answer, it is obvious, just didn't consider that part of the connection. Thanks also to Moritz. yl

[tor-relays] Public Tor Socks port

2015-03-24 Thread yl
port publicly. What are the reasons not to do so? Thanks yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Legal situation of tor in Europe

2015-03-11 Thread yl
fully agree to that, it would be helpful to get some more analytic data like this. Not necessarily on my exit, but some general numbers, some facts. I just assumed that number above, but actually have no idea. I got to list more carefully to Roger and Jacob next Winter in Hamburg. Greetings yl

Re: [tor-relays] Legal situation of tor in Europe

2015-03-09 Thread yl
will understand. Yours, yl ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays