Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-04 Thread teor
> On 5 Aug 2015, at 05:52 , starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > >> At Tue Aug 4 11:22:22 UTC 2015 by Olaf Selke olaf DOT selke at blutmagie DOT >> de >> >> by the way... I will probably shut down blutmagie >> tor network status in September this year cause >> the data center has terminated th

[tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-04 Thread starlight . 2015q3
>At Tue Aug 4 11:22:22 UTC 2015 by Olaf Selke olaf DOT selke at blutmagie DOT de > >by the way... I will probably shut down blutmagie >tor network status in September this year cause >the data center has terminated the contract >housing my servers 10/31/15. Could you make your modified Torstatus c

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-04 Thread starlight . 2015q3
Problem wit 0.2.7.2 is fixed. . .thank you Olaf! ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-04 Thread Olaf Selke
Am 04.08.2015 um 01:23 schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: At 16:10 8/3/2015 +0200, you wrote: debugging the old Blutmagie Perl scripts I found all routers like splitDNA running Tor 0.2.7.2 sending two hash values in the extra-info-digest. The second entry is a new 256-bit digest that will e

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-03 Thread starlight . 2015q3
At 16:10 8/3/2015 +0200, you wrote: >debugging the old Blutmagie Perl scripts I found >all routers like splitDNA running Tor 0.2.7.2 >sending two hash values in the extra-info-digest. The second entry is a new 256-bit digest that will eventually replace the current 160-bit digest and can be ignore

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-03 Thread starlight . 2015q3
Hi Olaf, The new ed25519 elliptic curve relay identity certificate now occupies the top of the extra-info document. The script should be able to handle the elements appearing in any order. Since the script is written in perl this should be an easy fix to search/match out the read-history and wr

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-03 Thread torrry
> debugging the old Blutmagie Perl scripts I found all routers like > splitDNA running Tor 0.2.7.2 sending two hash values in the > extra-info-digest. I suppose this isn't expected by the script parsing > the data. > > GETINFO desc/name/splitDNA > 250+desc/name/splitDNA= > router splitDNA 62.210

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-03 Thread Olaf Selke
Am 02.08.2015 um 17:39 schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: FYI list https: // torstatus DOT blutmagie DOT de is registering relays running 0.2.7.2 as having zero bandwidth. I believe this is because the write-history read-history lines in extra-info have moved from the top do

[tor-relays] Blutmagie does not see 0.2.7.2 bandwidth

2015-08-02 Thread starlight . 2015q2
FYI list https: // torstatus DOT blutmagie DOT de is registering relays running 0.2.7.2 as having zero bandwidth. I believe this is because the write-history read-history lines in extra-info have moved from the top down to the middle of the document. Many super-fast relays running