https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41edfd74b1cfbe83ded/raw/8cca2f354cbad259c5d5717f3ea2b51c9e51f391/2016-04-28--05-06_84_exits.txt
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.t
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor
relay of any kind is against their AUP.
On May 7, 2016 2:32 AM, "nusenu" wrote:
>
>
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41edfd74b1cfbe83ded/raw/8cca2f354cbad259c5d5717f3ea2b51c9e51f391/2016-04-28--05-
Maybe botnet ?
On May 7, 2016 2:46:31 PM GMT+02:00, Tristan wrote:
>Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a
>Tor
>relay of any kind is against their AUP.
>On May 7, 2016 2:32 AM, "nusenu" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500
Tristan wrote:
> Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running
> a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP.
That's news to me.
https://www.digitalocean.com/legal/terms/
Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, whe
Apologies, I must be thinking of a different service. I thought it was DO,
but I don't recognize the layout of the website.
On May 7, 2016 1:29 PM, "Yawning Angel" wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500
> Tristan wrote:
>
> > Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Runn
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500
Tristan allegedly wrote:
> Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running
> a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP.
Not so. I've been running a tor node on DO for three years now. They
know it, they are happy, so am I.
Mic
---
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500
Tristan wrote:
> Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor
> relay of any kind is against their AUP.
That's like... asking why bank robbers don't stop at traffic lights.
I mean this looks like an attempt to capture people's (in
On Sun, 8 May 2016 02:46:42 +0500
Roman Mamedov allegedly wrote:
>
> (That said, yeah, as others have replied DO TOS only restricts
> "grandfathered" accounts in this regard.)
>
Again, not so. I have a grandfathered account. DO have never had a
problem with my Tor node (or my other high traffic
On Sun, 8 May 2016 14:43:42 +0100
mick wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2016 02:46:42 +0500
> Roman Mamedov allegedly wrote:
> >
> > (That said, yeah, as others have replied DO TOS only restricts
> > "grandfathered" accounts in this regard.)
>
> Again, not so. I have a grandfathered account. DO have nev
So I could run a high traffic TOR exit node on a $5 VPS? oO
Sounds too good to be true...
2016-05-08 15:52 GMT+02:00 Roman Mamedov :
> On Sun, 8 May 2016 14:43:42 +0100
> mick wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 02:46:42 +0500
>> Roman Mamedov allegedly wrote:
>> >
>> > (That said, yeah, as othe
> So I could run a high traffic TOR exit node on a $5 VPS? oO
>
> Sounds too good to be true...
>
Yes, and for even less, but they sometimes disappear suddenly when their
business fails.
Robert
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torpro
11 matches
Mail list logo
