On 03/14/2014 02:45 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
...
See https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9969 for one case.
I wonder if these are clients running Tor versions from back before we
did directory fetches tunnelled over the ORPort -- clients from that long
ago would launch quite a f
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:23:50PM -0400, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
> Why would any IP address need
> more than one (or several simultaneous) connection is beyond me.
See https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9969 for one case.
I wonder if these are clients running Tor versions from back b
Those don't match up with any of the weird connections I've been seeing.
*shrugs*
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
> Not sure I should disclose them in a public forum, but somewhat obfuscated
> they are:
>
> 5.0.137.xx - Syria - 455 connections
> 66.150.6.xx - Groundspea
Not sure I should disclose them in a public forum, but somewhat
obfuscated they are:
5.0.137.xx - Syria - 455 connections
66.150.6.xx - Groundspeak, Inc - 108 connections
72.78.110.xx - Verizon - 202 connections
68.101.234.xx - Cox Communications - 51 connections
etc.
It seems there were attem
What are the IPs connecting to you? I've been watching my firewall logs
here recently and see several hosts from several distinct subnets
consistently trying to connect to TOR related ports.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:50 AM, I wrote:
> One of mine is being DDOSed today.
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
One of mine is being DDOSed today.
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>>> I think it is unusual.
>>>
>>> Are you just checking the tor log to see this?
>>
>> OK, so I am being DOSed then.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lis
On 3/14/14, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 09:37 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> I think it is unusual.
>>
>> Are you just checking the tor log to see this?
>
> OK, so I am being DOSed then.
Sorry I can't say, it just doesn't sound right. I've only run a relay
for a few weeks, and down the
On 03/13/2014 09:37 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
...
I think it is unusual.
Are you just checking the tor log to see this?
OK, so I am being DOSed then.
Maybe try installing some ip blacklist or dynamic firewalling?
rblcheck is a debian package which may be relevant.
Maybe time to do some
> On 03/10/2014 01:14 PM, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
>> I just recently allowed the directory ports of my relay to be listed and
>> noticed that some IPs are a bit overzealous in connecting to the
>> directory port. As in 108 connections within a minute zealous.
>>
>> Is this unusual?
I think it is unu
Anyone knows the answer? It happened again with another IP establishing
400+ connections to directory port within a minute. Me thinks it was not
a good idea to display the directory port.
On 03/10/2014 01:14 PM, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
I just recently allowed the directory ports of my relay to
I just recently allowed the directory ports of my relay to be listed and
noticed that some IPs are a bit overzealous in connecting to the
directory port. As in 108 connections within a minute zealous.
Is this unusual?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor
11 matches
Mail list logo
