calculate. Again thanks very much.
From: to...@protonmail.com
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 5:52 AM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight Definiton
Dear Keifer,
I run a small relay at home as well. (I've never had more than 4,000/4,500
connections, a
Dear Keifer,
I run a small relay at home as well. (I've never had more than 4,000/4,500
connections, and my home router seems to have had no problem.) However,
guessing from the tor docs on my ISP that I should keep my monthly throughput
to 1TB or so, I put some daily bandwidth limits on it.
Thank you. However another thing that is confusing me a little is that based
off of my research, relays without the stable flag shouldn’t recurve much
traffic; mine says it’s received a few gigabytes since the downtime 1 day ago.
Thank you. It is acceptable not to have the stable flag and still
> I guess not every relay has the stable flag, would be curious to know what
> the general percentage is
You can check with [Tor Metrics][] how many relays have the Running
flag and how many have the Stable flag. By looking at the graph I
would estimate around 80% of Running relays have the Stabl
Maybe that’s it, unfortunately I have nowhere else I can possibly run it.
What’s also not helpful is our electrical service isn’t good as it goes out
every time there is some bad weather, which does not help. I guess not every
relay has the stable flag, would be curious to know what the general
> On 22 Apr 2018, at 12:40, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> Thank you. I am just a little confused as I seem to get the stable flag
> randomly, sometimes after 2 days, sometimes after 4 days, sometimes longer;
> what I'm saying is it seems completely random.
Perhaps your network is unstable.
Most peop
Thank you. I am just a little confused as I seem to get the stable flag
randomly, sometimes after 2 days, sometimes after 4 days, sometimes longer;
what I'm saying is it seems completely random. My relay appears to be under
" maatuska", despite this I seem to get the stable after various numbers of
> On 22 Apr 2018, at 12:08, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> On https://consensus-health.torproject.org/, I found this information. I am
> curious, where it says stable-uptime=, the following number is in minutes
> correct?
It is in seconds:
> On 12 Apr 2018, at 08:33, teor wrote:
>
> On 12 Apr 2018
My apologies if I seem worried, I am not trying to sound that way at all,
just trying to understand how all of this works.
On https://consensus-health.torproject.org/, I found this information. I am
curious, where it says stable-uptime=, the following number is in minutes
correct?
Thank you.
Kn
Hi,
You talked about using homebrew to automatically update tor.
How do you launch tor?
Des homebrew restart tor when it is updated?
Because tor doesn't update to the new version until you restart it.
> On 22 Apr 2018, at 11:06, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> Thank you. And I’m not asking for a for sur
Thank you. And I’m not asking for a for sure response, just generally what you
think, would an about 40 minute downtime (what I had this morning) majorly
effect my time between failures after about 106 hours of solid uptime?
Sorry to keep emailing but trying to keep my relay as useful as possib
Hi,
> On 22 Apr 2018, at 08:35, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering, could you please explain exactly what “Consensus Weight” is?
> I had had a good uptime, about five days, then my darn computer that I run my
> relay off of froze for about 40 minutes this morning and I had no ch
Hello,
I am wondering, could you please explain exactly what “Consensus Weight” is? I
had had a good uptime, about five days, then my darn computer that I run my
relay off of froze for about 40 minutes this morning and I had no choice but to
reboot the tor software, setting my current uptime
13 matches
Mail list logo
