On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:33:45 +
mick allegedly wrote:
>
> Ho Hum. Time to look for another provider.
>
And in looking at alternatives I found this
http://stormvz.com/terms.html
on one site. The fourth "prohibited usage" item, lumps Tor in with
Phishing Sites and Proxy Scanners.
I've told th
This might be a bit of a shameless plug, but I used to use bitfolk (
bitfolk.com) - they have a generous allowance of bandwidth and allow tor as
long as you set it up correctly.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.tor
Am 31.12.2012 15:37, schrieb mick:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:33:45 +
> mick allegedly wrote:
> on one site. The fourth "prohibited usage" item, lumps Tor in with
> Phishing Sites and Proxy Scanners.
Greed is an enemy of freedom. At one side greedy people who abuse the
tor network for spamming,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:03:46 +
Daniel Case allegedly wrote:
> This might be a bit of a shameless plug, but I used to use bitfolk (
> bitfolk.com) - they have a generous allowance of bandwidth and allow
> tor as long as you set it up correctly.
Daniel
I looked at bitfolk a while ago. They do
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 03:03:46PM +, Daniel Case wrote:
> This might be a bit of a shameless plug, but I used to use bitfolk (
> bitfolk.com) - they have a generous allowance of bandwidth and allow tor as
> long as you set it up correctly.
I know from personal experience that Andy from bitfol
Are you only seeking providers outside of the U.S.?
I've been using PhoenixNAP for the last two years and am very happy with their
services. It's a dedicated server provider located in the United States, but
they are still very affordable. I've contacted them in the past about running a
TOR exi
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:24:36 -0700
j...@duskro.net allegedly wrote:
> Are you only seeking providers outside of the U.S.?
>
> I've been using PhoenixNAP for the last two years and am very happy
> with their services. It's a dedicated server provider located in the
> United States, but they are st
On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:38pm, "mick" said:
[snip]
> Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US.
> I think the US is probably already well served with tor nodes.
Yes, about 25% of all Tor nodes worldwide are in the US; Germany is in 2nd
place with 17%.
https://met
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:51:21PM -0500, Steve Snyder wrote:
> On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:38pm, "mick" said:
> [snip]
> > Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US.
> > I think the US is probably already well served with tor nodes.
>
> Yes, about 25% of all Tor node
On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:54pm, "Roger Dingledine" said:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:51:21PM -0500, Steve Snyder wrote:
>> On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:38pm, "mick" said:
>> [snip]
>> > Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US.
>> > I think the US is probably a
On 04.01.2013 21:38, mick wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer - but yes, I'd prefer to stay away from the US.
> I think the US is probably already well served with tor nodes.
If we did not run too many exits already, I would go for a Hong Kong
server with Limehost: http://www.limehost.ro/servere/dedic
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:40:42 +0100
Moritz Bartl allegedly wrote:
> If we did not run too many exits already, I would go for a Hong Kong
> server with Limehost:
> http://www.limehost.ro/servere/dedicated-models.html
>
> We have one of their older offers, dedi Gbit for 110 Euro in Romania.
> I am
12 matches
Mail list logo
