Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

Topposting because I notice when I look through this thread at all messages to date (last I saw was from de...@garlic.com received a few minutes ago) no reference to any of the organizations devoted to paying for relays that have been around for many years. Not sure if that is because of lack of

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

> Am 01.11.2023 um 17:53 schrieb dewaj : > [...] > Who wants to be identified as a tor user, let alone a relay operator? > […] I don't like this attitude at all and I don't think it goes with the demands of most operators either. I have often heard on this list and elsewhere sentences like: "It

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

This proposal carries hazards and other risks that no seems to have mentioned, let alone considered: Who will be responsible for global legal and tax-reporting compliance? If no one, then who is willing to take the fall for violating the various and sundry tax laws? Who else is willing to have

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

gus : > Hello, > > Hi, > I wrote this advisory: > > >There is currently no concrete evidence to confirm that the funds > >deposited in this wallet will indeed be redirected to the relays. > > And your first message to the reiya guy was: > > >Me: >last two months> > > -*- > I see we are on the

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

Hello, I wrote this advisory: >There is currently no concrete evidence to confirm that the funds >deposited in this wallet will indeed be redirected to the relays. And your first message to the reiya guy was: >Me: last two months> -*- If you're interested on building a project to reward

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

Hi, gus : > Hi, > > Nobody audited the code of 'reiya' project and there is currently no > concrete evidence to confirm that the funds deposited in that Monero > wallet will indeed be redirected to the relays. Therefore, we strongly > recommend not using that project. > I recently had a

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

Am Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2023, 15:04:07 CEST schrieb gus: > Nobody audited the code of 'reiya' project and there is currently no > concrete evidence to confirm that the funds deposited in that Monero > wallet will indeed be redirected to the relays. Therefore, we strongly > recommend not using

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

Hi, Nobody audited the code of 'reiya' project and there is currently no concrete evidence to confirm that the funds deposited in that Monero wallet will indeed be redirected to the relays. Therefore, we strongly recommend not using that project. Regarding funding Tor relays, please follow the

Re: [tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

Hi, exists. Something like this? There is a legal reason the Tor project doesn't fund nodes. Regards, On October 12, 2023 11:41:58 AM UTC, torrrel...@riseup.net wrote: >I provided some high speed Tor nodes (non-exits and guards) but I quit >in this year to make some space

[tor-relays] Discuss. Why not split donations to Tor relay owners?

I provided some high speed Tor nodes (non-exits and guards) but I quit in this year to make some space for my other projects. I would continue collaborating by keep Tor nodes online if I receive some donation. Is it just me, because I received $0 for running those Tor relays. So my proposal is