Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-09 Thread Sec INT
Good work Chris - not sure if you know yet but what sort of price per month and is it vps or dedicated? Cheers Mark B > On 9 Dec 2016, at 14:17, Michael Armbruster wrote: > >> On 2016-12-09 at 15:09, Chris Adams wrote: >> Okay, >> >> So I've found a ISP in Kenya that says

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-09 Thread Michael Armbruster
On 2016-12-09 at 15:09, Chris Adams wrote: > Okay, > > So I've found a ISP in Kenya that says they're happy to host a tor exit > node. The ping is 270ms from a Canadian ISP, 16 hops. 183ms from > Germany, 13 hops. > > Ultimately, am I making the tor network better or worse, if I were to > set up

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-09 Thread Chris Adams
Okay, So I've found a ISP in Kenya that says they're happy to host a tor exit node. The ping is 270ms from a Canadian ISP, 16 hops. 183ms from Germany, 13 hops. Ultimately, am I making the tor network better or worse, if I were to set up some tor nodes here? - Chris On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:41

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-09 Thread Sebastian Hahn
> On 09 Dec 2016, at 09:34, teor wrote: > > >> On 8 Dec. 2016, at 22:08, Sec INT wrote: >> >> US just has alot of people trying to exit there - so its always busy > > Tor clients choose exits at random, based on the ports the exit allows. > They *do

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-09 Thread teor
> On 8 Dec. 2016, at 22:08, Sec INT wrote: > > US just has alot of people trying to exit there - so its always busy Tor clients choose exits at random, based on the ports the exit allows. They *do not* try to find an exit close to the site they are going to. > - I find Tor

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-08 Thread Duncan Guthrie
Hi folks, I think it would be interesting to run relays in Africa and Asia. Especially Africa, as this area has growing internet usage, and censorship of the internet in some countries is not widespread, e.g. Liberia. Another argument is that even if there is censorship, having more relays in

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-08 Thread Sec INT
Exit nodes with equal bandwidth may well do. Unfortunately that one is now a Guard do throughput will probably go down. US just has alot of people trying to exit there - so its always busy - I find Tor follows the money mostly - high concentration in W.Europe and US but drops sharply anywhere

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-08 Thread David Serrano
On 2016-12-08 10:32:25 (+), Chris Adams wrote: > > Don't exit nodes with equal bandwidth have equal chance of being utilised > on a circuit? Why is your US exit being utilised more? I think this would be related to the bandwidth observed by the authorities, which are far away (network wise)

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Adams
Interesting... Don't exit nodes with equal bandwidth have equal chance of being utilised on a circuit? Why is your US exit being utilised more? Looking at the map, I thought Canada could do with a few more exits? Should geo diversity be related to numbers of internet users in that country? Ie,

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-08 Thread Sec INT
Ive got exits in the US, France ,Finland (dead) and Bulgaria but its v difficult to find any exit providers in the Far East - I have relays in Bangalore and Singapore (which gets hit pretty hard) but if you do find a provider out East let us know P.s Bangalore is under utilised - 60mb/s but

[tor-relays] Exit Node Geographical Location

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Adams
Hello, I want to start up another exit node. I have a few choices for which country it's in. I currently live in a country with quite a high exit node/population density. Are there any advantages to distributing nodes around the globe in terms of performance/privacy? Are there some countries