On 11/28/2014 11:40 PM, I wrote:
How many instances could this run?
Intel E3-1240 Dedicated Server Special
Server Location: Buffalo USA
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 3.40 GHz
HDD: 500GB 7200RPM
RAM: 16GB DDR3
Bandwidth: 10TB Monthly Traffic
IP: /29
Port Speed: 1Gbit
fully
How many instances could this run?
Intel E3-1240 Dedicated Server Special
Server Location: Buffalo USA
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 3.40 GHz
HDD: 500GB 7200RPM
RAM: 16GB DDR3
Bandwidth: 10TB Monthly Traffic
IP: /29
Port Speed: 1Gbit
Price: $119/Month
Sale Price: $59/month
Robert
10TB/month is 30Mbit/s. You will have reached those 10TBs long before
coming close to maxing out a single CPU core. I'd estimate that a single
E3-1240 CPU core can deliver between 150Mbit/s and 250Mbit/s.
The specs on that server are fine, it's just not a lot of bandwidth.
Tom
I schreef op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/25/2014 02:29 PM, Syrup-tan wrote:
The colocation isn’t cheap to say the least, and it only gives
5TB/month unless we want to pay more per month;
This may the largest logistical problem I've encountered when looking
for dedicated
Turns out the colocation costs $672/year for the network, and another $780/year
for power, so I don’t think Voxility is very feasible for an exit node without
bargaining with them.
If anyone knows of a good way of finding high-bandwidth budget
dedicated servers (a search term or a list of
Someone may wish to look into Rokubear, I remember them being mentioned
as Tor Exit friendly a few years back.
-Jason
On 11/28/2014 01:54 AM, Syrup-tan wrote:
Turns out the colocation costs $672/year for the network, and another
$780/year for power, so I don’t think Voxility is very feasible
sorry was https://www.rokabear.com/ not roku
-Jason
On 11/28/2014 01:56 AM, ja...@icetor.is wrote:
Someone may wish to look into Rokubear, I remember them being mentioned
as Tor Exit friendly a few years back.
-Jason
On 11/28/2014 01:54 AM, Syrup-tan wrote:
Turns out the colocation costs
On 28/11/2014 02:54, Syrup-tan wrote:
Turns out the colocation costs $672/year for the network, and another
$780/year for power, so I don’t think Voxility is very feasible for an
exit node without bargaining with them.
This isn't all that expensive for colo; it's just not on the bargain end
They don't seem to be offering a lot of servers right now...
https://clients.rokabear.com/cart.php?gid=3
niklas
On 28/11/2014 02:56, ja...@icetor.is wrote:
Someone may wish to look into Rokubear, I remember them being mentioned
as Tor Exit friendly a few years back.
-Jason
On 11/28/2014 01:54
On Thursday, November 27, 2014 8:39pm, Libertas liber...@mykolab.com said:
[snip]
If anyone knows of a good way of finding high-bandwidth budget
dedicated servers (a search term or a list of providers, for example),
please share. I expected there to be more of a market for this kind of
thing
On 11/24/2014 03:06 AM, s7r wrote:
If the only limit is consumed monthly traffic, and not the bandwidth
your relays consumes daily (e.g. you use your VPS only for Tor) it is
not recommended to use RelayBandwidthRate. Better use AccountingMax,
and your relay will work at full speed until it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2014 7:32 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 11/24/2014 03:06 AM, s7r wrote:
If the only limit is consumed monthly traffic, and not the
bandwidth your relays consumes daily (e.g. you use your VPS only
for Tor) it is not recommended to use
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:42:15 -0800, Mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote:
How much throughput do you get with your VPS, 1000 GB/mo or 2000 GB/mo?
The 1000 GB/mo applies to whichever value is greater, input or output. So
far the Tor node is pushing less than 1.5GB per day. Takes a while for
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:13:17 -0800, ZEROF secur...@netmajstor.com wrote:
I saw some info just yesterday, but it's not in actual server
configuration. Can you provide some good resource for setting
dnscrypt-proxy? And no logging DNS's is good to protect end users
A caveat: You should probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm not using opendns. OpenNic and OpenDNS are not same thing.
On 23 November 2014 at 23:59, Seth wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:13:17 -0800, ZEROF wrote:
I saw some info just yesterday, but it's not in actual server
configuration. Can you
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 16:53:03 -0800, ZEROF secur...@netmajstor.com wrote:
I'm not using opendns. OpenNic and OpenDNS are not same thing.
I'm aware of the distinction.
What I was trying to point out for the benefit of people just getting
started with dnscrypt-proxy, is that by default it
http://blog.censurfridns.dk/en
Pretty sure this is no fon.
On 24 November 2014 at 02:18, Seth l...@sysfu.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 16:53:03 -0800, ZEROF secur...@netmajstor.com wrote:
I'm not using opendns. OpenNic and OpenDNS are not same thing.
I'm aware of the distinction.
What
On 11/23/2014 11:05 AM, s7r wrote:
That is, because in almost all cases, providers allow unmetered
incoming traffic to your server but keep count and accounting on
outgoing traffic from your server, which is why the torrc setting acts
the way it does.
That would be great! I'll confirm with
I would happily chip in to a node like that.
One thing, though, about USA is their fickleness when shown a legal letter.
I increased VPSs to more than ten paid a year in advance with GreenValueHost
because they were so helpful they even reinstalled Tor and sorted some Linux
problems for me. Then
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:35:18 -0800, I beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote:
So USA can be fast and cheap but beware when they agree Tor is
acceptable because there are poor trade practices laws to get refunds
and rights.
FWIW I spun up a Tor exit node on VULTR. I pro-actively informed them I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just checked them now, that is great if they will allow you to run Tor
exit nodes on such cheap virtual machines. 5$ for 1000GB is a good
deal for US traffic, and bitcoin accepted is an important pro. But I
am concerned if they will sustain Tor exits
On 11/22/2014 05:56 PM, Seth wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:35:18 -0800, I beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote:
So USA can be fast and cheap but beware when they agree Tor is
acceptable because there are poor trade practices laws to get refunds
and rights.
FWIW I spun up a Tor exit node on
If you are looking for good solution, I'm testing right now
http://roundabove.com, running one exit node with exit rules provided
from https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy.
Tor's uptime is 11 days 12:00 hours, with 194 circuits open. I've sent
182.16 GB and received
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:46:18 -0800, ZEROF secur...@netmajstor.com wrote:
I use servernames without logging from this this list
http://wiki.opennicproject.org/Tier2 (France).
Great resource of logless DNS servers, I'm a big fan of OpenNIC.
Have you bothered to encrypt DNS traffic by setting
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:58:37 -0800
From: Seth l...@sysfu.com
...
I should have also mentioned in my previous post I put the following in
/etc/tor/torrc
# Bandwidth and data caps
AccountingStart day 19:45 # calculate once a day at 7:45pm
AccountingMax 33 GBytes # 33GB X 30 days =
On 11/22/2014 06:58 PM, Seth wrote:
SNIP
I should have also mentioned in my previous post I put the following in
/etc/tor/torrc
# Bandwidth and data caps
AccountingStart day 19:45 # calculate once a day at 7:45pm
AccountingMax 33 GBytes # 33GB X 30 days = 10GB shy of 1000GB/mo.
Dear Relay Operators,
I noticed there are very few US based exit nodes in the network. And more and
more
people are jumping on the same set of AS numbers in Europe.
I am not if the reason is lack of Tor friendly ISPs or people are just too
freaked out about
the summer of Snowden.
I think it's
Hi SiNA,
On 11/22/2014 01:08 AM, SiNA Rabbani wrote:
Dear Relay Operators,
I noticed there are very few US based exit nodes in the network. And more and
more
people are jumping on the same set of AS numbers in Europe.
[...]
Thank you, SiNA. A reminder to relay operators: Diversity is
28 matches
Mail list logo
