Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread Kurt Besig
On 12/11/2016 1:43 PM, Rana wrote: >> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote: >> >> OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me >> [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ] >> >> The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread teor
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 08:43, Rana wrote: > >>> >>> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote: >>> >>> OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me >>> [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ] >>> >>> The one answer of

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread Rana
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote: > > OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me > [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ] > > The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that > arm actually means Kbytes/sec and

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread teor
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana wrote: > > OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me [even > though I "lack programming skills" :) ] > > The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that arm > actually means Kbytes/sec and

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread Rana
OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ] The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that arm actually means Kbytes/sec and not kbits/sec when it writes Kb/s I have arm reporting average of at least

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread teor
> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 00:08, Rana wrote: > >>> On 10 Dec. 2016, at 07:12, Rana wrote: >>> >>> My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are >>> inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are: >>> Atlas “advertised”

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread Rana
>> On 10 Dec. 2016, at 07:12, Rana wrote: >> >> My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are >> inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are: >> Atlas “advertised” (which is actually supposed to be “measured”?: 100 KB/s >> =

Re: [tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread teor
> On 10 Dec. 2016, at 07:12, Rana wrote: > > My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are > inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are: > > > Atlas “advertised” (which is actually supposed to be “measured”?: 100 KB/s > =

[tor-relays] Inconsistent BW measurements of unused relay

2016-12-11 Thread Rana
My relay remains severely under-used. One thing that bothers me are inconsistent bandwidth measurements. Here they are: Atlas "advertised" (which is actually supposed to be "measured"?: 100 KB/s = ~ 800,000 bit/s "I have sent" reported in Tor log: on the