Re: [tor-relays] Legal Status of Relays Worldwide [was: kittens seized]

2017-05-25 Thread Cristian Consonni
On 21/05/2017 21:47, grarpamp wrote: >> On 21/05/2017 14:14, Nagaev Boris wrote: >> Can they force an operator to decrypt, if he lives in other country >> which is non-US and non-EU (e.g. Russia or China)? Does it make sense >> to run nodes in countries you don't live in or visit? > > If poor odds

Re: [tor-relays] Legal Status of Relays Worldwide [was: kittens seized]

2017-05-23 Thread grarpamp
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Nagaev Boris wrote: > Unfortunately rarer things happen. The ongoing case in Russia: > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/13/tor_loses_a_node_in_russia_after_activists_arrest_in_moscow/ > "According to TASS, he’ll be held for two months pending investigation." >

Re: [tor-relays] Legal Status of Relays Worldwide [was: kittens seized]

2017-05-22 Thread Nagaev Boris
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:47 PM, grarpamp wrote: That's actually why the torservers.net people suggest *not* using disk encryption. Having no barriers makes it much easier for the police to realize that there's nothing useful to them. > >>> This falling over may perhaps not be prefe

Re: [tor-relays] Legal Status of Relays Worldwide [was: kittens seized]

2017-05-21 Thread I
The salient point... " Real problems are rare, and running relays is fun :) " ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Legal Status of Relays Worldwide [was: kittens seized]

2017-05-21 Thread grarpamp
>>> That's actually why the torservers.net people suggest *not* using disk >>> encryption. Having no barriers makes it much easier for the police to >>> realize that there's nothing useful to them. >> This falling over may perhaps not be preferred by operators who like to >> create wins in the cry