Hello everyone!
As indicated in our bug tracker a while ago[1] we have some strong
incentives to redo our ContactInfo field. I've collected all the
different use cases and combined them in a single proposal, discussing
some potential concerns and future work we could get built upon it. The
wo
Hi Georg,
First of all, thanks to all of you for the effort writing up the proposal!
I saw that email obfuscation was discussed but no solution was proposed. I
want to throw in some ideas about obfuscating the email centrally:
- Let's not publish cleartext email in any public descriptor, and only
Hi!
Xiaoqi Chen (Danny):
Hi Georg,
First of all, thanks to all of you for the effort writing up the proposal!
Sure. Thank you for your input.
I saw that email obfuscation was discussed but no solution was proposed. I
want to throw in some ideas about obfuscating the email centrally:
- Let's
I've been thinking long and hard about this problem and I'm not sure if an
email address - validated or not - is the best way to achieve the initial goals.
What are the goals of having this validated email address?
1- Inform the operator;
2- Make sure the operator will read the info;
3- Identify
On 10/31/2023 03:09 PM t...@nullvoid.me wrote ..
> My only concern with your solution is anyone can pretend to be the owner of a
> relay.
- What do you have to say to a relay owner that cannot be said publicly?
- What do you have to say that needs a reply?
In the rare cases where you would have
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 15:54:37 +
Georg Koppen allegedly wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> As indicated in our bug tracker a while ago[1] we have some strong
> incentives to redo our ContactInfo field. I've collected all the
> different use cases and combined them in a single proposal,
> discussin