On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:03:43PM -0700, Lance Hathaway wrote:
On the plus side, obfs3 is still pretty strong, and it's one of the
common pluggable transports right now. Scramblesuit is not live in the
official bundles yet (AFAIK), but it just released and has some pretty
robust-looking
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Lance Hathaway qh...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you're going to be running these as bridges, it seems to make sense
to include obfsproxy support, probably with obfs3 and scramblesuit [0]
enabled right off the bat.
Thanks for the information. Is it likely that obfs3
James Valleroy:
The reason that I'm asking is that FreedomBox is currently working
within Debian testing but our target is Debian stable. Once our
packaged configuration is frozen for the next stable release, it will
be more difficult for us to push changes other than security fixes.
(Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/03/2014 11:56 AM, James Valleroy wrote:
Thanks for the information. Is it likely that obfs3 and
scramblesuit will be usable in the long-term? Or will they need to
be deprecated at some point like obfs2?
Also, if obfs3 or scramblesuit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18/03/2014 7:59 PM, James Valleroy wrote:
Do you see any vulnerabilities, attacks, or risks with the current
configuration, and are there any changes that you would recommend?
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox [2]
