Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-11-01 Thread Ralph Seichter
* teor: > I don't understand what you mean by "an exit". Do you mean "the Exit > flag" or "an exit policy that allows some ports"? I put "an exit" in quotes because I think there are different interpretations. I consider a Tor Exit to be a specialisation of a Tor Node which allows connections

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-31 Thread teor
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 22:47, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > * teor: > >> If a client doesn't have a circuit to an exit that supports the port >> it wants, it randomly chooses an exit that allows that port. > > Sure, but is the distinction of what is considered "an exit" reflected > in the exit

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-31 Thread Ralph Seichter
* teor: > If a client doesn't have a circuit to an exit that supports the port > it wants, it randomly chooses an exit that allows that port. Sure, but is the distinction of what is considered "an exit" reflected in the exit flag? And is it truly random, or does the consensus weight factor into

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-31 Thread teor
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 16:41, DaKnOb wrote: > > You can exit to one of (80,443) to at least a /8 to receive it.. So if you > add an allow 443 on a not so populated /8, it will get the exit flag.. :-) Careful: * this isn't a great experience for users who use your exit, and * getting the Exit

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-31 Thread DaKnOb
You can exit to one of (80,443) to at least a /8 to receive it.. So if you add an allow 443 on a not so populated /8, it will get the exit flag.. :-) > On 30 Oct 2018, at 17:30, Spiros Andreou wrote: > > Just a note that I believe you will lose the exit flag for not having at > least ports 80

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-30 Thread teor
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 01:53, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > * Isaac Grover: > >> You are correct in that I won't maintain the exit flag without ports >> 80 and 443 open, *and* I lose my eligibility for a free t-shirt, *but* >> I am not likely to attract attention at my home either. =) > > No exit

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-30 Thread s7r
Hello, Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T. wrote: > Good morning Spiros, > > You are correct in that I won't maintain the exit flag without ports 80 and > 443 open, *and* I lose my eligibility for a free t-shirt, *but* I am not > likely to attract attention at my home either. =) > > Make your day

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-30 Thread Ralph Seichter
* Isaac Grover: > You are correct in that I won't maintain the exit flag without ports > 80 and 443 open, *and* I lose my eligibility for a free t-shirt, *but* > I am not likely to attract attention at my home either. =) No exit flag means your relay will not be used as an exit, just as a

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-30 Thread Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T.
Good morning Spiros, You are correct in that I won't maintain the exit flag without ports 80 and 443 open, *and* I lose my eligibility for a free t-shirt, *but* I am not likely to attract attention at my home either. =) Make your day great, Isaac Grover, Senior I.T. Consultant Aileron I.T. -

Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-30 Thread Spiros Andreou
Just a note that I believe you will lose the exit flag for not having at least ports 80 and 443 open On October 30, 2018 2:31:15 PM UTC, "Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T." wrote: >Good morning, > >As a followup to my last (and other) posts on this list, I have been >cautioned multiple times of

[tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

2018-10-30 Thread Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T.
Good morning, As a followup to my last (and other) posts on this list, I have been cautioned multiple times of running an exit node from my home. After careful consideration and previous direct feedback from this list, I configured an exit node with the following exit policy, which allows