Hi Guys
I today received notification from DO that they have changed their
Terms of Service and Acceptable Useage policies. Having read those
changed notices it is clear to me that DO are no longer really Tor
friendly. They do not allow exits and whilst my guard relay there
(at roof.rlogin.net wit
Why not run it until they spot it and shut it down?!
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays On Behalf Of mick
Sent: 15 October 2020 11:42
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-relays] Shutdown of my digital ocean guard relay
Hi Guys
I today received notification from DO that
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:41:52 +0100
mick wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I today received notification from DO that they have changed their
> Terms of Service and Acceptable Useage policies. Having read those
> changed notices it is clear to me that DO are no longer really Tor
> friendly. They do not allow
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020, at 13:09, Dr Gerard Bulger wrote:
> Why not run it until they spot it and shut it down?!
I assume they'll send him a big bill for all of the bandwidth that he
uses :).
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:09:49 +0100
"Dr Gerard Bulger" allegedly wrote:
> Why not run it until they spot it and shut it down?!
>
Because the last time they changed the rules (when they introduced
charging for bandwidth) I got hit (automatically) with a big bandwidth
charge despite having been to
On 15.10.2020 16:24, mick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:09:49 +0100
"Dr Gerard Bulger" allegedly wrote:
Why not run it until they spot it and shut it down?!
Because the last time they changed the rules (when they introduced
charging for bandwidth) I got hit (automatically) with a big bandwi
On 2020-10-15 10:24, mick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:09:49 +0100
"Dr Gerard Bulger" allegedly wrote:
Why not run it until they spot it and shut it down?!
Because the last time they changed the rules (when they introduced
charging for bandwidth) I got hit (automatically) with a big bandwi
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:20:02 +0100
mick wrote:
> The new ToS says:
>
> "5.6 As a reward for being early adopters of the Services, some Users
> with older Accounts received free bandwidth promotions contingent on
> their Accounts remaining operative, in good standing, and in compliance
> with thi
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:27:43 +0500
Roman Mamedov allegedly wrote:
>
> Could you point out which change you are referring to? The point 3.7
> saying that unmetered bandwidth accounts must not run "TOR" has been
> there since the earliest the Wayback Machine has it, from May 8th,
> 2018:
>
Hi Rom
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 20:05:03 +0200
li...@for-privacy.net allegedly wrote:
>
> If you want to operate a stress-free exit, take a look at frantec.
> A 4Gb KVM has unlimited bandwidth and if you stick to the AUP,
> Francisco and staff will even take care of the abuse mails.
> https://buyvm.net/acce
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:54:38 -0400
postmas...@coolcomputers.info allegedly wrote:
> Do you plan on hosting else where mental note to not use DO for TOR.
> Although i just use my own server for tor now. I also provide hosting
> but it cost more then DO.
Yes, I will look elewhere. DO are /very/ e
11 matches
Mail list logo
