Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node
on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap.
I had inquired in the beginning if they allowed Tor, and they said
yes, but if we get too many abuse complaints we'll shut it down. So
maybe 4 or 5 abuse comp
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400
Tom Ritter allegedly wrote:
> Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node
> on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap.
>
> I had inquired in the beginning if they allowed Tor, and they said
> yes, but if we ge
On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400
> Tom Ritter allegedly wrote:
>
>> Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node
>> on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap.
>>
>> I had inquired in the beginning if they all
I'm currently trying to build a network on Brazil. The main problem is
to get a fast network link. Telecoms brought out shitty infrastructure
and high "combo deal prices". But I hope that bringing up more nodes
should attenuate the issue. At least for web browsing.
--
Luther Blisset
GNUPG/PGP KE
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:02:29 -0400
krishna e bera allegedly wrote:
> On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if we are going to see more of this sort of thing now. I
> > think the tor network needs greater geographic diversity.
>
> Makes me wonder if there is some kind of legal pres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2013 12:44 PM, mick wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:02:29 -0400 krishna e bera
> allegedly wrote:
>
>> On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder if we are going to see more of this sort of thing now.
>>> I think the tor network nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2013 12:02 PM, krishna e bera wrote:
> On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400 Tom Ritter
>> allegedly wrote:
>>
>>> Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running
>>> a node on SiteValley, as
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:02:29 -0400
krishna e bera wrote:
> On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400
> > Tom Ritter allegedly wrote:
> >
> >> Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node
> >> on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwi
On 18 July 2013 14:10, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Maybe they just realized they can't actually offer unmetered bandwidth as they
> advertise, and Tor is about the only application that can readily eat all
> bandwidth you'll give it, no matter what.
>
> Tom, out of curiosity how much did you manage to
I don't see anything specific regarding Tor or its capabilities
in their AUP. But there are bits that could be extended to
cover Tor. Which it appears they did, whether for bandwidth
or cost of dealing with 'complaints'.
They are in New Hampshire, perhaps you could let the
FreeStateProject know (c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/2013 12:24 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> I don't see anything specific regarding Tor or its capabilities in
> their AUP. But there are bits that could be extended to cover Tor.
> Which it appears they did, whether for bandwidth or cost of dealing
> wi
Tom Ritter:
> On 18 July 2013 14:10, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>> Maybe they just realized they can't actually offer unmetered bandwidth as
>> they
>> advertise, and Tor is about the only application that can readily eat all
>> bandwidth you'll give it, no matter what.
>>
>> Tom, out of curiosity how
Gordon Morehouse:
> Yeah, I had to leave GANDI not because of admin pressure but because
> they instituted a 500GB data cap instead of unmetered.
Just to let others know, Nos Oignons [1] reached to them about the new
pricing scheme and they offered to sponsor a 25 Mbit/s exit relay. It
should get
>> GANDI
> Just to let others know, Nos Oignons [1] reached to them about the new
> pricing scheme and they offered to sponsor a 25 Mbit/s exit relay. It
> should get live in the upcoming weeks. :)
>
> [1] https://nos-oignons.net/%C3%80_propos/index.en.html
GANDI is pretty well known for good thi
Lunar:
> Gordon Morehouse:
>> Yeah, I had to leave GANDI not because of admin pressure but because
>> they instituted a 500GB data cap instead of unmetered.
>
> Just to let others know, Nos Oignons [1] reached to them about the new
> pricing scheme and they offered to sponsor a 25 Mbit/s exit rela
That stinks.
Linode has the same policy WRT exit relays.
If they get too many abuse complaints, they ask you to stop running a
relay. The way US law is structured, I can't actually blame them for this.
However they don't care if you're running a middle node. Your
bandwidth/VPS, your call. A *
16 matches
Mail list logo
