I don't think that niftybunnys reply was that rude, but it could be more
efficient.
Anyway i wouldn't say this has anything to do with to big to fail,
Tobias Westerhever did a really poor job at researching and did not ask
anything, instead started speculating random stuff, this is what I
His complete story is a pile of bullshit.
If you want me out, get me banned, I am happy to throw all the money I am
paying every month into blackjack and hookers with my good friend Bender.
niftybunny
> On 13. Sep 2018, at 19:11, Paul wrote:
>
> Hello Tobias,
>
> please stay - this list
Hello Tobias,
please stay - this list needs people like you and your curious questions!
I was away for a couple of days and feel ashamed that nobody came along to
support you or stops this bunny.
I assume those Nifty rodents produce a lot of "Stop making shit up, fucking
disclaimer, complete
Just so we are on the same page:
You accused us to counterfeit to be Zwiebelfreunde, even being a bad (state)
actor, did nothing at all to contact us and cant even read simple Interwebs
tools.
What did you expect?
niftybunny
> On 10. Sep 2018, at 19:05, Tobias Westerhever
> wrote:
>
>
Hello *,
thanks for your replies.
Since this topic seems to be overheated by now, I
decided not to ask any further questions. In my point
of view, some of the confusion was caused due to poor
documentation (as Moritz pointed out), some because of
tools returning outdated information (HE BGP, for
› Hello,
›
› recently, I noticed some strange aspects related to networks
› of Torservers/Zwiebelfreunde. Since there was no way to get any
› further information on this topic so far, I am posting it here.
› Maybe someone can help.
Lets recap this for a moment:
1. Every relay of my family has my
Hi,
nusenu:
>
> Moritz Bartl:
>> On 08.09.2018 22:19, Paul wrote:
>>> i am glad that somebody else got notice and i agree, suspecting
>>> something nasty (or highly unusual) is going on. There was a discussion
>>> about that in Berlin in July already
>>>
Moritz Bartl:
> On 08.09.2018 22:19, Paul wrote:
>> i am glad that somebody else got notice and i agree, suspecting
>> something nasty (or highly unusual) is going on. There was a discussion
>> about that in Berlin in July already
>>
On 08.09.2018 22:19, Paul wrote:
> i am glad that somebody else got notice and i agree, suspecting
> something nasty (or highly unusual) is going on. There was a discussion
> about that in Berlin in July already
>
Hi!
On 08.09.2018 09:43, Tobias Westerhever wrote:
> (a) Torservers relay family decreased?
> The organisation used to maintain much more relays than their
> family [1] currently contains. At the moment, only four relays
> located in NL belong to them, while the Metrics page indicates
> some
Hi,
(it is actually not necessary to speak for Moritz [1] here who is a
core Tor person, but maybe the lastest raids[2] made him a bit more
busy.)
Zwiebelfreunde is a legal body registered in Dresden, Saxony (Germany).
You can contact them via
https://www.zwiebelfreunde.de/contact.html
Hello Tobias,
i am glad that somebody else got notice and i agree, suspecting
something nasty (or highly unusual) is going on. There was a discussion
about that in Berlin in July already
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/BerlinRelayOperatorsMeetupJul18
but no public
Am 08.09.2018 um 09:43 schrieb Tobias Westerhever:
Hi Tobias
I understand your post is about specific larger exit entities.
Unfortunately I do not know anything to that. Please let me 2-cent to
some of your points.
> However, there is a _huge_ relay family (27 members, with a
> total bandwith
Hello,
recently, I noticed some strange aspects related to networks
of Torservers/Zwiebelfreunde. Since there was no way to get any
further information on this topic so far, I am posting it here.
Maybe someone can help.
(a) Torservers relay family decreased?
The organisation used to maintain
14 matches
Mail list logo
