Thanks for that Roger, it's a valid point. How do they simultaneously
protect the rights of their actual users while warning against all the
bad actors that feel the need to defecate all over such an important
service (Tor, that is :).
Part of me thinks that some kind of system like the way car
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:02am, Chris Patti cpa...@gmail.com said:
[snip]
I tried running an exit for a bit and it lasted a few weeks before
some brainless wonder hijacked someone's Gmail with my exit, so I had
to pull it down and go relay only.
Me too. I dearly wish there a way to
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:02:45AM -0500, Chris Patti wrote:
I tried running an exit for a bit and it lasted a few weeks before
some brainless wonder hijacked someone's Gmail with my exit, so I had
to pull it down and go relay only.
Even worse (or maybe better), this sort of thing happens when
Hey Stephen,
I'm a relatively new operator, and I run over a half dozen Reduced Exit
relays and a few middle relays.
Abuse complaints shouldn't be common coming from IRC - the main culprits
for complaints are DMCA and related for alleged IP (Intellectual
Property) theft. That would be your
Hi list,
I was looking for suggestions/discussion on very conservative policies
for an exit relay. I run a relay now that is reject *:* and I wanted
to open up a few exit ports. I don't want to open up major ports due to
potential abuse issues. My server host states that, although they do
allow
