Re DHCP in general...
Some OS, particularly some mobile oriented Linux
distros, phones, and even in popular modem gear,
do now come with MAC randomizers, or have them
available as addon packages. If they are enabled they
can turn any seemingly static-IP-ness that comes
from ISP DHCP servers, into
On 5/2/19, Herbert Karl Mathé wrote:
> I strongly believe certain issues need be brought up into conscious, and
> into presence: into discussion, actually.
>
> Therefore appreciating this as it might fit too well into context
>
> Keeping things below surface, or trying so, has too often proven to
On 5/2/19, grarpamp wrote:
> Node location, payment, OS, ISP, uptimes, anon / nym / PGP / GovID,
> workplace, politic, blogs, whatever else you can imagine,
> including incorporating what's already in the consensus, contact,
> MyFamily, nickname, both real world and virtual infos
>> On Jun 30, 2019, at 8:32 PM, Matt Westfall wrote:
>>
>> Just set your exit relay DNS to 8.8.8.8 and 1.1.1.1 I mean dns traffic
Screw that MITM.
And unless your on box resolver lib runs nscd cache from rc
when using remote dns above, busy exits can also save some
bandwidth by running local
> never relied on the OS Package of Tor, mainly because OS’s OpenSSL versions
> are behind the current version of OpenSSL, so I normally compile Tor against
> the latest OpenSSL. Example, FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE has OpenSSL
> 1.1.1a-freebsd, which generates a slight crypto error during the startup of
On 8/6/19, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:31:39PM -0400, Rob Jansen wrote:
>> Today, I started running the speedtest on all relays in the network.
> There will be another confusing (confounding) factor, which is that the
> ...
> as intended. :) So, call it another thing to
On 12/12/19, Logforme wrote:
> My ISP ... does not provide ... and has no roadmap
> I can't switch ISP since they provide the fiber connection for the
> apartment building.
Seems you should be building out your own
P2P fiber mesh guerrilla network house-to-house
owner-to-owner, each node
> than lets drop all IPv4 only relays from consensus 2020 finally.
Someone may have mentioned already...
Given many places relays do and could run are
still IPv4 only, that would probably impact diversity
quite a bit regarding AS, regions, jurisdiction, ISPs,
datacenter vs network edge type of
> So what can we do to achieve the ideal distributed network?
> Throttle all (nodes) to the slowest... to get the best diversity?
> We need all (nodes), whether high or small capacity. Don't we?
Tor is a form of gravity well. If the cloud is not saturated,
adding more nodes increases odds of
> If you have an old PC with 2 ethernet ports laying around or you can get
> one cheap I suggest you build your own:
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/04/the-ars-guide-to-building-a-linux-router-from-scratch/
Yes any old PC combined with opensource OS is great "router".
Some find the two OS
On 3/6/20, William Pate wrote:
> This constantly trips me up. In my modem settings, I'm offered these options
> for port forwarding. I know I need to open 9001, but what do I enter into
> the external port fields?
>
> Which ISP is better?
They all suck.
Go start your own ISPs and meshnets that actually gives a shit
about people, privacy, transparency, censorship, servers, speech,
freedom, crypto, and actually fights back against government
largesse, intrusion, regulation, power, etc.
Demand is high, you
301 - 312 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
